Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JasonC; Mitchell
I also call your attention to the following interesting book review:

Historical Muhammed

117 posted on 11/18/2002 1:48:11 AM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC; Mitchell
One excerpt from the review above:

'A Summary of Wansbrough's Theories and Their Implications'. Berg summarizes the implications of Wansbrough's Quranic Studies (1997) as follows:

Neither the Koran nor Islam is a product of Muhammad or even Arabia. During the early Arab expansion beyond Arabia, there is no evidence that the conquerors were Muslim. Almost 200 years later 'early' Muslim literature began to be written by the Mesopotamian clerical elite. The implication may be that the hitherto secular polity discovered and adopted a new movement which, though a non-Jewish, non-Christian movement, was a product of a Judaeo-Christian sectarian milieu. This movement and its history were soon Arabicized. The Koran, however, took somewhat longer to be canonized - not until circa 800 CE. (495)


118 posted on 11/18/2002 2:04:21 AM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson