Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weapons Inspectors Warn Of Delays
Independent (UK) ^ | 11-23-2002 | Ken Sengupta

Posted on 11/23/2002 2:59:29 PM PST by blam

Weapons inspectors warn of delays

By Kim Sengupta in Baghdad
24 November 2002

A newly arrived United Nations team has warned of delays in inspecting the most controversial suspected Iraqi weapons sites, including the palaces of Saddam Hussein. The news is likely to infuriate Washington, which has little time if it is to launch an invasion of Iraq before the onset of hot weather there.

The UN says that it does not yet have enough personnel, secure communications or transport to start its mission this week with "surprise raids" on the most sensitive targets. It has yet to set up a system to take witnesses out of the country for debriefing, to protect them from possible intimidation by the regime.

The inspectors are reluctant to begin their mission by immediately confronting Baghdad. They believe it would not only be counterproductive, but could damage the prospect of ascertaining whether President Saddam does indeed possess an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction.

The Bush administration is widely seen as seeking an excuse to launch an attack. The UN's delay could mean that the US loses the optimum season for a military campaign, from around now until the end of February.

A fresh batch of 18 inspectors, 12 from the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) looking for chemical and biological weaponry, and six from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) seeking evidence of Iraq's nuclear programme, are due to arrive in Baghdad tomorrow. The first inspection is due to take place on Wednesday.

However, the sheer amount of cleaning up that has needed to be done has meant that the UN has not yet been able to put in its own secure communications system. And the mission's fleet of helicopters needs to be serviced.

Although some members of the Bush administration have openly disparaged the UN mission and its chief Hans Blix, UN officials on the ground are determined not to be pushed into carrying out high-profile searches without adequate preparation. During his visit to Baghdad last week, the 74-year-old former Swedish foreign minister stressed the need to obtain Iraqi co-operation without needless threats.

Miroslav Gregoric, the highly experienced and respected head of mission, stressed his team will "proceed with our plan in a practical and methodical way and achieve what has been asked of us". UN spokesman Hiro Ueki added: "We have to first revisit the previously monitored sites to check if the equipment installed is still functional. It will take some time to do that work."

The US has kept up its pressure on Iraq with the Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, declaring that Washington would refuse to accept any Iraqi pleas in its report to the UN, due on 8 December, that it does not have weapons of mass destruction.

The Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf said on a visit to India: "We will be transparent, we will do things correctly, objectively. [But] we are ready to defend our country. We are working to avoid a calamity."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: delays; inspectors; war; weapons
Attack the UN!!
1 posted on 11/23/2002 2:59:29 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Why is this not a surprise. Get the UN out of Iraq and flatten the Presidential palaces from the inside out.
2 posted on 11/23/2002 3:00:35 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Tick . . . tick . . . tick . . .

3 posted on 11/23/2002 3:03:50 PM PST by w_over_w
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Who's surprised at this? The UN sided with Iraq long ago. The whole thing is a farce. We should attack now.
4 posted on 11/23/2002 3:07:36 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I think this article is preparing us for NEXT week's headline news. I'm waiting to see some serious (series) progress over there.

This line puzzles me: launch an invasion of Iraq before the onset of hot weather there.

Maybe I'm losing it, but I thought they were about to go into winter in Iraq.

5 posted on 11/23/2002 3:13:39 PM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
During his visit to Baghdad last week, the 74-year-old former Swedish foreign minister stressed the need to obtain Iraqi co-operation...

Blix is clearly the wrong one for this job--what an idiot!

6 posted on 11/23/2002 3:22:21 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
'Ya got me. I guess it depends on how long we'll be involved in the fighting over there. If only a month or so, we have plenty of time. If it goes on five months, say, we are running out of time.

Personally, I don't think it'll take even a month. But who knows? Saddam might pull a rabbit out of his hat.

Since we can't be 100% sure, I'd like to see us start the war yesterday. :-(

7 posted on 11/23/2002 3:22:45 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"Who's surprised at this? The UN sided with Iraq long ago. The whole thing is a farce. We should attack now.

Yup. Just go ahead a move Saudia Arabia to the head of the list while we're waiting on the UN.

8 posted on 11/23/2002 3:22:47 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Attack the UN!!.......

Pay off Al Qaeda to fly an airplane into it.
9 posted on 11/23/2002 3:24:48 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The UN says that it does not yet have enough personnel, secure communications or transport to start its mission this week with "surprise raids" on the most sensitive targets.

I am sure that Rumsfeld is congratulating Powell on the superb manner in which the guys and gals over at State have been handling this hole thing.

10 posted on 11/23/2002 3:27:25 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
This is what Cheney/Rummy referred to as the inspections trap.
11 posted on 11/23/2002 3:29:11 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Apparently the article alleges that February is the onset of hot weather in Iraq.
12 posted on 11/23/2002 3:31:06 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Those morons probably haven't even found their hotel yet.

Is there any doubt that the UN "inspectors" are nothing more than patsys sent in to delay the U.S.?
13 posted on 11/23/2002 3:32:12 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: boogerwoods
Perhaps that is the "goal" as you put it, IF the plan is to attack anyway. Personally, I'd rather see less bloodshed/possible nukes if it could be avoided. I'm having trouble believing that we could be just setting it up because we're bound and determined to attack.

How're are things at DU, btw?
15 posted on 11/23/2002 6:16:15 PM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: boogerwoods
I find it telling that there is a C-130 especially configured and capable of talking all the inspectors, etc. out on one flight. I'm sure Saddam is aware of that also and what it means.
17 posted on 11/23/2002 8:07:49 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
This line puzzles me: launch an invasion of Iraq before the onset of hot weather there.

Maybe I'm losing it, but I thought they were about to go into winter in Iraq.

I remember reading that the French believed if they could delay the invasion of Iraq for six months, they could delay it forever. The point is that Blix and Saddam, partners in delay, will try to drag out the whole inspection thing at least until Spring and, if they have their way, until Iraq has its first nuclear test under its belt.

Where then? I suppose Saddam will broadly hint what he is going to do with his nukes if the US doesn't abandon the no fly zones. Then we're in retreat and, success breeding success, Al Quaeda's back in the recruiting business big-time.

Of course, I am not a tin hat alleging some French/UN/Iraq conspiracy. Iraq knows what it is doing, but Blix, France, and company are just doing what comes naturally.

18 posted on 11/23/2002 8:21:00 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
I find it telling that there is a C-130 especially configured and capable of talking all the inspectors, etc. out on one flight. I'm sure Saddam is aware of that also and what it means.

Well, of course, any sensible parent of one of these inspectors must be scared to death of the risks their child takes of becoming a hostage. I guess that the way Blix will protect his people from this fate is to suck up to Saddam. Sad to say, perhaps, but it probably will work. If Blix keeps on saying he has not found Iraqi WMD, that C-130 will probably be allowed out just as the Marines are coming in. Still, by conducting inspections despite Iraq's highly insulting reply to UN Resolution 1441, Blix is risking his peoples' lives unnecessarily. If he really wanted to know the truth, all he would need is to have some of the Iraqi defectors polygraphed.

19 posted on 11/23/2002 8:30:28 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson