Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard Marx
Well, you made the statement, "Forcing 'facts' to fit preconceived theories is not science." This would put your life in danger from the evolutionists. Thought you might want a head start.

75 posted on 11/26/2002 5:05:08 PM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
I was afraid that's what you meant. You and LostTribe continue this particular discussion with each other. You two seem to be on the same wavelength. I'll get back to the underwater artifacts with the rest of the gang.

Just so you understand for the future, theories (like evolution) don't offer conclusions. They are temporary logical constructs to explain observed phenomena. They're open to modification or complete elimination when/if new or contradictory facts present themselves. But I have a hunch you know this already.

I have as little respect for scientists who buy into pet theories with religious fervor on too little evidence as I do with fundamentalist 'true believers' of any kind, religious or political, who try to bend others to their wills without any evidence at all. They are the truly dangerous people of the world.



77 posted on 11/26/2002 5:58:54 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson