Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!
CAPITALISTCHICKS.COM ^ | FR Post 12-1-2002 | Debbie Brannigan

Posted on 12/01/2002 1:24:01 PM PST by vannrox

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!

Debbie Brannigan (Email Author)

"Never say never". That has been my mantra these days. Ten years ago it seems I had a never ending list of things that "I'll never (fill in blank)". One of those was "I'll never get a tattoo." I would have sworn to it back then. Well here I am, in my late 30's, getting a tattoo. It was not a rash decision made while finishing off rounds of tequila in the bar. No, actually, it was a very long thought process with much research. Those who know Tara and me personally know that we had a very rough and challenging time just a few years back. This tattoo was a personal marker of that time and how we came through it. Like most people who get tattoos, it is a very personal statement that marks a significant chapter of your life.

Perhaps this is why I find the tattoo ban of South Carolina so absurd. It seems outrageous that in the Land of the Free, there is a law prohibiting self expression on your very own body. No, this is not one of those antiquated laws that nobody pays attention to, like not being allowed to go hatless in public on a Sunday. No, this is a very real and every enforced law.

Sect. 16-17-700 (S.C. Code of Laws)

"It is unlawful for a person to tattoo any part of the body of another person. It is not unlawful for a licensed physician or surgeon to tattoo part of a patient's body if in his medical opinion it is necessary when performing cosmetic or reconstructive surgery."

I can't help but laugh at the image of my doctor performing a pap smear, and then scrubbing up for a "tattoo procedure". I don't know any physicians that can write a prescription clearly and I can't imagine what a tattoo by one would be like. Considering it is only permitted when deemed medically necessary, I don't suppose many will find out what creative talents their doctors may possess.

"Certainly this is not being enforced" you may say. Oh, but it is! Consider the case of Mr. Ron White. Ron is a talented and dedicated tattoo artist currently living in Florence, S.C. In 2000, WBTW-TV was filming a 3-part series on the history and practice of tattooing. The station asked White to demonstrate the process. On camera, in his own home, he tattooed the arm of a willing participant. When the program aired, the county sheriff arrested White and he was sentenced to a year in prison and a fine of $2,500. This was later reduced to 5 years of probation and a $500 fine. Now Ron White can't carry his firearms, drink in a bar, or leave the state without prior permission from his probation officer.

White appealed his conviction all the way to the S.C. Supreme Court. He contested that tattooing is an art form and should be protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court did not see it that way and on March 4th, they upheld his conviction. Undeterred, Ron's next move was on to the US Supreme Court. An international law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, took up Ron’s cause and is providing him with legal services free of charge. His lawyer is none other than Kenneth Starr who became well known when he headed up the investigation into President Clinton's Whitewater real estate development and former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. "In a free society, this is intolerable." says Starr.

South Carolina is one of only two states that ban tattooing entirely. Oklahoma is the other.

South Carolinians who wish to get tattooed must either cross the border or do it illegally. People are doing it in basements and backrooms and this can only increase the risk of disease. Tattoo artists like White would like to see the state create health regulations for the practice to ensure public safety. They would like to be allowed to operate a business and claim that the state is only losing out on revenue to its neighboring states, N. Carolina and Georgia.

Opponents to this ban have an ally in the S. Carolina State Senate: Sen. William Mescher, R-Berkeley. Mescher says he would like to bring tattooing out of the underworld of basements and garages, and let the Dept of Health and Environmental Control regulate it. He has introduced legislation over and over for several years in an attempt to lift the ban. The medical community and DHEC support Mescher's measures, as does the Governor's office. So where is the resistance? For as long as Mescher has tried to legalize tattooing, Jake Knotts has stood in his way. Jake Knotts is a Lexington Republican who served many years in the SC House of Representatives before recently winning a special election to the State Senate. Knotts bases his opposition to tattooing on what he claims is a biblical mandate against marking the body. "It's spelled out very vividly in the Bible that tattooing is taboo" Knotts has said. "I am opposed to it and it ain't gonna pass. I'll do whatever I got to do to stop it. " It is mentalities like this that make me thankful for Separation of Church and State.

I found it hard to believe that this ban was enforced and upheld purely by personal religious opposition and attempted to find the documented reasoning behind the law. I naturally contacted Sen. Mescher's office and expected the usual brush off. Not the case. I was helped by Sen Mescher's very informative assistant, Debbie Griffin. Not only did I get her direct phone number and email address, she also faxed over countless documents and articles. I was surprised to see that the only wording documented is the brief paragraph of text that I listed above (sect 16-17-700). There is never any mention as to WHY this ban was approved. It is assumed that it was originally a health concern. In the 1960's nearly all states banned tattooing after a hepatitis outbreak was blamed on a dirty tattoo parlor in New York. By the 1980's those prohibitions had all vanished, except in S. Carolina and Oklahoma. It is ridiculous to think that you can pierce any imaginable body part and ride your motorcycle without a he lmet but you cannot adorn yourself with a tattoo in S. Carolina.

Tattooing is an ancient art form that can be traced back to Egypt 8,000 years ago. Celtic tribes used plant pigments for tattooing in early cultures and the oldest proof of tattooing can be found on the body of a 5,300 year old "iceman". Tattooing is the oldest form self expression and individuality. In modern day America tattoos have progressed from the bad-ass-biker-gang image to a more main stream and even chic persona. The fastest growing category of tattoo clients in America is the suburban upper class female aged 35-45 years. Not quite the same clientele you'd see in tattoo parlors of the 50's and 60's. Thus, most parlors today are the high tech and sterile environments that this new clientele would prefer and expect. There appears to be little risk that tattooing presents a serious problem in public health. According to a dermatologist in the Federal Office of Cosmetics and Colors the most common problem with tattoos is not infection but dissatisfaction. As for myself, I am completely satis fied with my own tattoo. Not only with the artwork itself but also with the artist, Jen Billings, and the clean and friendly parlor: "Atlas Tattoo" of Portland, OR. I could not imagine having to go across state lines or in some back alley to have it done.

For Ron White and Ken Starr, the legal battle continues. On October 7th the U.S. Supreme Court denied to review the case. Their case is now pending in Federal Habias Court. In the meantime, there is some hope of repeal through the legislative process. Previously, Sen. Mescher's bill would pass only to die in the House at the hands of Rep. Knotts. Now that Jake Knotts was elected to the state senate in April, there is little opposition left in the House.

If you are reading this and living in S. Carolina, I would suggest you contact your local congressman and voice an opinion on this ban. For Ron White the road to justice must seem long and frustrating. He will continue his probation restrictions and wait for the day he can actually ply his trade as a valid businessman and recognized artist.

Until then, the 1st Amendment will protect the art but jail the artist in S. Carolina.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrat; dnc; law; liberal; power; republican; tattoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: billbears
It was absolutely wonderful on a Sunday afternoon.

After fleeing the thug-controlled state of Ohio (1969), East Tenn. and South Carolina were such righteous places to live. I know what you mean.

The Bible states God's blessing will not be on a people or nation which deliberately turns the Sabbath (Lord's day) into just another day of merchandising and pleasure. We are on this earth for His pleasure, not ours.

61 posted on 12/02/2002 4:06:35 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Have you not heard of the New Testament? Your rant exposes your ignorance.

Of course I've heard of the New Testament, that's the whole point! You're the one who was claiming that bans on tattooing are legitimate because it's forbidden in Leviticus.

Do you mind telling me which commandments in Leviticus you believe in and which you don't? And how are the rest of us non-holy-rollers supposed to know?

-ccm

62 posted on 12/02/2002 6:20:35 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
According to Department of Health info, there are no documented cases of HIV being contracted through tattoos. Hep B was the greatest risk, while there have been a couple of Hep C cases reported.
63 posted on 12/02/2002 6:37:28 AM PST by Doc-Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Doc-Joe
Think I'd advise avoiding amateurs with needles, anyhoo. The incidence of Hep C transmission is likely higher than you realize. Spend a little more time in the ER and you'll see quite the gallery of dreadful art on naked patients...skulls and sexual "art", gang tattoos--ick.

Letting some dingaling loose on you with needles that might be dirty, in order to create a lifelong mutilation? *Definitely* a lowrent behavior.

64 posted on 12/02/2002 7:23:03 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
If I chill I might keep shuddering...women's tattoos are these days in the small of the back, inside the thigh, and crawling up the ankle. They are very popular with the "exotic dancer" crowd, and hookers seem to particularly like the decorations around the navel. Believe me, I wish I didn't *know*...
65 posted on 12/02/2002 7:26:47 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
You're the one who was claiming that bans on tattooing are legitimate because it's forbidden in Leviticus.

Please show me where I posted that. All I said was tattooing is heathen and pagan. What are you smoking?

I.And how are the rest of us non-holy-rollers supposed to know?

Do you consider yourself a pagan or heathen?

Please show me a pagan or heathen nation in the history of the world which has enjoyed the liberties we have enjoyed in the USA. You know what? You can't.

There is no liberty outside of Christianity.

66 posted on 12/02/2002 7:36:28 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk; Mamzelle; CWRWinger; PistolPaknMama

Love Hate Tattoo - Rochester, New York

67 posted on 12/02/2002 8:23:53 AM PST by bc2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
I give up trying to explain the concept of personal liberty to these people.

"Conservative" and "Liberal" just don't apply to one's place in the political spectrum anymore. FR has become overrun with STATISTS.

68 posted on 12/02/2002 2:07:17 PM PST by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pocat
You can always go to Georgia or NC for the backstreet needle jockies, if you must. I doubt that the law exists for any other reason that health or social concerns. Or maybe aesthetics? You can legislate against obnoxious eyesores like litter and deliberate disfigurement.
69 posted on 12/02/2002 2:12:04 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: vannrox


You gotta be kidding me!
70 posted on 12/02/2002 2:17:52 PM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
You can legislate against obnoxious eyesores like litter and deliberate disfigurement.

Got pierced ears?

71 posted on 12/02/2002 3:14:51 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Got pierced ears?

The country club conservatives will never give you a straight answer on those types of questions posed by us heathens.

72 posted on 12/02/2002 5:24:36 PM PST by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Why don't you go back and carefully read what I was responding too. I was simply helping someone recall a verse they couldn't quiet remember. I offered no opinions on the matter.

In fact I'm constantly reading this site and very rarely do I offer an opinion. My observations are that there are only a few people in the forums that take the time to actually read what is written instead of skimming or making an assumption with no basis and then going off half cocked ranting and raving at somebody.

By the way, the Lord Jesus Christ will handle my judgment, I don't think he will need to confer with you.

73 posted on 12/02/2002 6:39:25 PM PST by Down South P.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ccmay; CWRWinger
This is the acid test for all true believers.

No it is not. I have already said I have no problem with people who want tattoos. I know lots of people who have tatoos. Let them go to a state where it is legal to get them. Personally, I don't want my tax dollars spent to regulate these places.

74 posted on 12/02/2002 9:06:30 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
among SC natives...(the more tatoos, the fewer teeth)...
Tattoos used to be for sailors. Now sorority girls get tattooed barbed wire around their biceps.

And in SC all these sorority girls are toothless?

75 posted on 12/02/2002 9:11:15 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Barry Goldwater laughs at you from beyond the grave.

By the time of his death Goldwater had become a wholly irrelevant, confused and bitter old codger, whose opinions were about as substantial and intellligent as the bilabial fricative wheezings emanating from a whoopee cushion.

Which, of course, is why many libertarians revere him.

76 posted on 12/02/2002 9:20:09 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
By the time of his death Goldwater had become a wholly irrelevant, confused and bitter old codger

I met him three or four years before his death. He spoke on current affairs for half an hour, without notes, and then answered unscripted questions from the audience. His opinions were crisp, consistent, and wholly relevant. He showed no trace of bitterness or confusion.

In his retirement, some religious fanatics became upset with him because he scorned the reptilian Rolex-flashing TV preachers who were giving conservative politics a bad name. Unfortunately, these holy-rolling wackos have burrowed deeply into the party apparatus. It's a sad commentary on today's Republicans that so many of them prefer a heap of filth like Pat Robertson or Jimmy Swaggart to a great leader and patriot like Barry Goldwater.

Goldwater was one of the four or five greatest men in the history of the Grand Old Party. He had more character in his little finger than all the TV preacher weasels put together. God bless him and keep him.

-ccm

77 posted on 12/02/2002 10:55:19 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Please show me where I posted that. All I said was tattooing is heathen and pagan.

You are correct.

It was actually the holier-than-thou state senator who referred to the Bible to support keeping tattooing illegal in South Carolina.

You, on the other hand, said that you also wanted to keep the ban, because tattooing is heathen and pagan, and you want to keep our culture as Christian as possible.

Silly me, I thought you were agreeing with the senator's interpretation of Leviticus. Thanks for setting me straight.

I assume this means you cannot cite any Biblical support for your view; you just have a feeling that because it seems heathen and pagan to you, that's reason enough to ban it. Am I missing something?

-ccm

78 posted on 12/02/2002 11:29:20 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
I don't want my tax dollars spent to regulate these places.

What a presposterous argument. If your tax dollars do not go to regulate the parlors, they will go to the cops you pay to shut them down, in vastly greater amounts. Try again.

-ccm

79 posted on 12/02/2002 11:36:13 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Maxpowers
Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, Leviticus 19:28

Who is Matthew Henry and why should I give a damn for his opinion?

-ccm

80 posted on 12/02/2002 11:37:44 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson