It just went off patent so it will stay on the market. The trial lawyers, on the other hand, won't fail to get their cut. Are they suing any patients who failed to inform themselves sufficiently to make better decisions?
Why don't the patients go ahead and prescribe it themselves?
The answer to both of those questions would be that they aren't doctors.
I was informed of a 1% risk. If they flat out lied and caused me to take a bigger risk with my child than I would have accepted... I don't know what I will do. Enriching the lawyers seems ridiculous. But how else do we force them to be honest?