Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

England: Heroin (+ Needles) To Be Offered As Part of National Health Care
BBC On-Line ^ | Tuesday, 3 December 2002 | staff writer

Posted on 12/03/2002 8:21:52 AM PST by yankeedame

Tuesday, 3 December, 2002, 15:22 GMT

Heroin to be offered on the NHS

The government wants to target vulnerable people

Heroin is to be available on the NHS to all those with a clinical need for it, as part of the government's new drugs strategy. About 400 heroin users already get the drug legally on NHS prescription but access nationwide is patchy.

David Blunkett is making the signal to young people that cannabis is alright

Keith Hellawell Former drugs 'czar' The new drugs plan centres on a "treatment strategy" aimed at those using hard drugs like heroin and crack cocaine.

It was published amid criticism from the government's former drugs policy co-ordinator that ministers' stance on cannabis was now a "dog's breakfast".

Heroin users would be given prescribed supplies of the drug in safe, medically supervised areas, using clean needles.

A government official said the drug would be prescribed only where other treatments, such as methadone, had not worked or where doctors believed they would not work.

The plan does not extend to Scotland, where the Scottish Executive says it will monitor the move.

Cutting the rapid rise of crack cocaine use is another target of the government plan, which updates the 1998 strategy.

Cannabis trials

New plans include reducing the supply of the drug to the UK and introducing more specialist treatment programmes.

The focus on Class A drugs follows research suggesting that 99% of the costs run up by drug users comes from Class A addicts.

Click here to read how treatment works Clinical trials have been taking place into the use of cannabis for medical treatment.

The drugs company steering those trials is now set to apply for a licence and ministers say they are encouraged by the results of the tests so far.

Other plans in the strategy include:

Increasing spending on tackling drug use by 44%, taking spending to almost £1.5bn for 2005/6 Expansion of residential treatment programmes Launching an education campaign in the new year, aimed at young people. Mr Blunkett said: "We know cannabis is dangerous but it does not lead to the kind of total disintegration of people's lives that heroin, crack and ecstasy do, and we know they kill.

"We are concentrating on a massive increase in treatment - we have the first National Treatment Centre - and we are going to link that with rehabilitation."

Mr Blunkett wants an emphasis on treatment

Specific targets for reducing the numbers of people taking drugs are being dropped.

In a move that has provoked criticism, Mr Blunkett said the target of halving hard drug use by 2008 was "not credible".

Those who prefer a more liberal strategy say the government is sending out mixed messages.

Under the new Criminal Justice Bill, to be debated by MPs this week, any individuals caught with any Class C drugs could be arrested.

Mr Blunkett downgraded cannabis from Class B to C in order to allow greater focus on Class A drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

That meant it remained illegal, but possession of small amounts would no longer be considered an arrestable offence.

Mixed messages?

Keith Hellawell, former UK drugs coordinator for the government, said he felt the cannabis issue had become a "dog's dinner".

He added: "David Blunkett is making the signal to young people that it is alright.

"He will deny it but that is the signal."

Roger Howard, chief executive of charity DrugScope, praised the focus on hard drugs and the shift towards more treatment.

But Mr Howard added: "We regret that the government did not seize this opportunity to be more bold.

"Important opportunities to save lives have been missed by refusing to back harm minimisation schemes, such as safe injecting rooms."

Stirring moral panic

Mr Howard argued that putting ecstasy in the same bracket as cocaine and heroin would seriously undermine the strategy's credibility among young people.

The Conservatives have been pushing for many more rehabilitation centres for users of heroin and cocaine.

The Liberal Democrats meanwhile welcomed the focus on hard drugs but said making possession of Class C drugs an arrestable offence made a mockery of reclassifying cannabis.

Home affairs spokesman Simon Hughes said: "The government should stop whipping up moral panic about cannabis and ecstasy and focus the efforts of the criminal justice system on heroin and crack cocaine."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2002 8:21:52 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: yankeedame
Drug legalization in England has failed. Not because it wasn't a good idea, but because the people are so oppressed and hopeless that they resort to drug usage as a means of escape.

In a healthy, free society where people believe that there is a positive future, you will see drug usage decline and limited to the people who would destroy their lives no matter what.
3 posted on 12/03/2002 8:35:24 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
In a healthy, free society where people believe that there is a positive future, you will see drug usage decline and limited to the people who would destroy their lives no matter what.

Can you point to such a society? (out of curiosity)

4 posted on 12/03/2002 8:49:23 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
When were drugs legalized in England?
5 posted on 12/03/2002 8:52:03 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Prodigal Son
Sure. The United States of America before the busy bodies in Congress outlawed drugs. (That would be the same Congress that gave us the 16th, 17th, and 18th Amendments.)
7 posted on 12/03/2002 8:59:42 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Late 80's, I think. It was such a failure that it was repealed. (I am relying on my Swiss cheese memory here.)
8 posted on 12/03/2002 9:00:46 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I didn't realize marijuana, heroin, cocaine, crack, ecstasy etc were widely available then... Is there any contemporary society you could use as an example?
9 posted on 12/03/2002 9:11:51 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I forget who it was who said that "Margret Thatcher was a heroin dealer" in the 80's. It was a prominent figure. It may have been Lyndon Larouche during his rise to 15 minutes.

Funny how truth becomes stranger than fiction....

10 posted on 12/03/2002 9:18:27 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrowningBAR
But I think his point was that Britain is a defeated, demoralized society.

I keep hearing Freepers say this. Could you tell me where this part of Britain is? I've lived here for a bit over three yrs and have yet to run across it. The people here don't strike me as being any different than people I've met anywhere. I certainly wouldn't describe them as demoralized.

Heaping legal drugs like herion and pot onto the culture will only add fuel to its destruction.

I agree. The gov't shouldn't be in the business of providing junkies with their high. I don't agree with the methadone program either. I also don't think the gov't should be in the business of curing people of their habits. But that's why social medicine is the trojan horse of oppression- these people cost the NHS money which motivates politicians to want to do something about it. It's an ugly circle.

11 posted on 12/03/2002 9:20:10 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
You may be remembering the heroin maintanance trials in White Chapel, which dealt with a small number of addicts who were prescribed heroin, under the proviso that they follow up with regulary doctors visits and group therapy. A far cry from legalization. They were, of course, painted as a failure by the U.S., since forcing people to quit wasn't part of the program. The clinicians involved thought it a rousing success, as the addicts were able to stabilize their lifestyles, and return to work. Political pressure resulted in the trial being shut down.
12 posted on 12/03/2002 9:21:30 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Well opimum was widely availible, marajuana was also freely availible, and cocaine was around also. The politics surrounding the criminalization of dug use in this country is amazing. Interesting that the same congress that rammed through the progressive income tax is the same one that gave us the Harrison(?) act.
13 posted on 12/03/2002 9:50:11 AM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Prodigal Son
Reading your Info Page has really piqued my curiosity. What, pray tell, is a Libertarian and -- using your screen name as a clue -- probably a born again believer, doing living in Scotland?

During the first year or so of my living in the UK, I was non-political (at least I thought I was). But after the first year or so of living in the UK (and living/traveling to many other countries around the world) and experiencing the effects of socialism, I began to recognize myself as a solid, committed, limited-government American.

Now I live in New Hampshire. And I thank God for it.

Do you plan to stay there?

15 posted on 12/03/2002 10:46:36 AM PST by NH Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BrowningBAR; *Wod_list
society must [...] use coercion to get them off drugs.

Why must it? Does this include the deadly addictive drugs alcohol and tobacco?

16 posted on 12/03/2002 10:46:48 AM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: BrowningBAR
I agree 100%. So when you said "society must [...] use coercion to get them off drugs", what did you mean by "coercion" if not the heavy hand of goobermint?
19 posted on 12/03/2002 11:07:48 AM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson