Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mennonite Midwife Behind Bars - A case of overreach
NRO ^ | December 3, 2002 | Benjamin Wiker

Posted on 12/03/2002 9:52:40 PM PST by gubamyster

December 3, 2002, 8:30 a.m.

By Benjamin Wiker

Diminutive, soft-spoken, gray-haired inmate 17204 at Holmes County Jail has been behind bars for over a month. She wears an orange jumpsuit rather than her usual modest blue Mennonite dress. She stays in a cellblock on the second floor. Heavy iron beds, vinyl mattresses, metal sink, and toilet combination. No privacy. Most annoying of all, for this quiet, prayerful 47-year-old are "the blaring TV and the foul language from the girls. I'd appreciate specific prayer concerning that."

Who is this criminal? Freida M. Miller is a lay midwife. She's been at it for 17 years, and delivered close to 2,000 babies. She was named Midwife of the Year in 1998 by the Ohio Midwives Alliance. And she has never lost a mother.

For Miss Miller, being a midwife is a vocation. "I think it was born in me. I truly think to be a midwife, you have to have a calling from God. It's not a job, it's a ministry." It must be. She doesn't charge for her services. Some patients give her a donation. Some can't afford it. It's all the same to Freida Miller.

What, then, is her crime? Freida Miller is guilty of saving a life. Nearly a year ago, on December 17, 2001, Miss Miller administered a prescription drug, Pitocin, to Jan Joyal to stop excessive bleeding after the successful home birth of Joyal's daughter Rebekah. Standard procedure for any midwife or any doctor. But when the bleeding failed to stop, she accompanied Joyal to Joel Pomerene Hospital. There she revealed to the doctor on call that she had administered Petocin to stop the bleeding. That bit of honesty cost Miss Miller her freedom.

If she had lived in one of the 19 states that officially recognize midwives (and hence allow them to administer Pitocin), she would not be in jail now. But the problem is, that Ohio does not recognize lay midwives.

It is not that lay midwives are illegal in Ohio, mind you. They are quite legal. This is Amish and Mennonite country, and homebirthing is part of their simple, Christian, rural way of life. In Holmes County, where she is incarcerated, one in eight births was a homebirth last year. The problem is that there is simply no law on the books in Ohio that regulates lay midwives. So, there's no regulatory body to which Miller and other midwives could go to get permission to carry and administer Pitocin.

Here's the nasty catch-22. Without Pitocin, midwives like Miller would be guilty of endangering their patients' lives. But technically, Pitocin is a prescription drug that can only be administered by qualified medical personnel. What's an Ohioan midwife to do?

It is not even that Pitocin is dangerous. According to Faith Gibson, executive director of the American College of Domiciliary Midwives, "Pitocin, when administered in a postpartum situation (i.e., after the baby is born) is one of the safest drugs in the world, in fact safer than aspirin." Gibson fired off a letter in support of Miss Miller, commending her actions on behalf of her patient as exemplary midwifery. "Frivolous prosecutions of midwives are detrimental to the practical well being of mothers and babies."

Even more ironic, is that there is actually a state bill, HB 477, ready and waiting to clear up the whole problem. This bill fulfills the 1998 recommendation of a special study council set up by the Ohio's general assembly that "the practice of midwifery be legal in Ohio and that any ambiguity in the law on this issue be resolved to prevent prosecution of either direct-entry midwives [i.e., lay midwives] or parents who choose to use direct-entry midwives."

According to bill sponsor Rep. Diana Fessler (R., New Carlisle), a former lay midwife, the silence of the law is dangerous. "Although current state law includes a provision governing certified nurse-midwives, the law does not address the practice of midwifery by non-nurse midwives. As a result, non-nurse midwives continue to be concerned that an overzealous prosecutor could charge them with practicing medicine without a license."

They have good cause for concern. Freida Miller met not only an overzealous prosecutor, but an equally overzealous judge. Prosecuting Attorney Stephen Knowling and Holmes County Common Pleas Judge Thomas D. White have nailed her with felony charges of Unauthorized Practice of Medicine and Possession of Dangerous Drugs. When Miss Miller refused to name the source from whom she got the Petocin, Judge White sent her to jail, and he shows no sign that he is going to let her out — unless she'll squeal.

Even more maddening, Freida admitted not really understanding the illegality of her possession and use of this harmless drug. All she knew was that saving a life was her sacred duty as a midwife. Witness the court transcripts from her original hearing on May 1, 2002.

JUSTICE WHITE: "Did you understand that that [administering Petocin] was a violation of Ohio law?"

MILLER: "Kind of. I should have understood. I should have checked it out better."

JUSTICE WHITE: "Okay."

MILLER: "But I will bow my idea to a better one."

JUSTICE WHITE: "In your opinion was that necessary to save her life?"

MILLER: "If we wouldn't have made it to the hospital fast enough, yes. We might have been able to make it to the hospital fast enough, but it would have been taking a chance."

Commenting in a later interview, Miller said "I didn't really know it was illegal…I wish I would have never used the stuff….If I wasn't sure it was illegal, I'm not sure that I'm guilty….I don't really know what the allegations are about; they're not specific enough."

Is she angry about the seeming injustice? "The whole thing is something God knows all about and he has a plan," she says. "I don't want to fight for anything, I just want to fit myself into God's plan, and I'm not angry at anybody."

But others are. It is very difficult not to be angry at a judge and prosecutor who are going after this sweet, holy, and harmless midwife as if she were guilty of peddling cocaine at the local playground. What drives the seemingly unbalanced fervor with which they have gone after this beautiful and beloved Mennonite midwife?

The fervor appears to have driven Judge White and company to extend their powers into legally gray areas. On August 28, 2002, the Holmes County Health Department arrived at the home of Freida Miller and confiscated over 50 of her client records. After hundreds of supporters of Miller showed up to pray at the courthouse, Judge Miller threatened Miss Miller with a stiffer penalty if they should dare to do so again.

He could use a crash course in democracy.

One suspects the judge has some power issues. Unfortunately, in the last election — which occurred while Miss Miller was in jail — Judge White ran unopposed.

Meanwhile, my wife, who is almost seven months pregnant, is without a midwife. We're hoping Freida will be free by then.

— Benjamin Wiker, a fellow at the Discovery Institute, is the author of Moral Darwinism: How We Became Hedonists.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: freidamiller; mennonite; midwife

1 posted on 12/03/2002 9:52:40 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2sheep; babylonian; Nov3
Be prepared for kind freepers to dance in glee at this woman's predicament.
2 posted on 12/03/2002 10:02:07 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Perhaps it is God's plan that the people rise up and cast Judge White out of office. That would give some value from her incarceration.
3 posted on 12/03/2002 10:06:15 PM PST by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Well, I hope she's released soon. Two of my babies were delivered by midwives, and one by a doctor. There is a difference. Midwives listen to you, talk to you as a human. They ask you what you want, instead of telling you. P.S. (The article centers on midwifery as religious, but plenty of people, religious and nonreligious, use midwives).
4 posted on 12/03/2002 10:06:54 PM PST by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
And she has never lost a mother.

No mention of babies. Curious.

O2

5 posted on 12/03/2002 10:30:08 PM PST by omegatoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Doctors DO NOT like competition.

How many other tasks could just as well be performed by well-trained non-doctors, I wonder?

6 posted on 12/03/2002 10:35:33 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; babylonian; Prodigal Daughter; Thinkin' Gal; f.Christian; shaggy eel; Crazymonarch; ...
>One suspects the judge has some power issues. Unfortunately, in the last election — which occurred while Miss Miller was in jail — Judge White ran unopposed.

Demon power issues.  One suspects that the devil has been cast down and his princes are occupying the bodies of gov't leaders and judges in high places.  That judge is not normal. 

Eph 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.  12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

This case reminds me of a couple classic articles by Claire Wolfe about 4-5 years ago where she wrote that there were so many laws on the books that they can get anyone for almost anything if they want to do so, including little old ladies "taking one prescription pill out of its drugstore bottle and carrying it around in a different container. (Just think of all those dangerous, blue-haired old lady felons lurking in your neighborhood with pills stashed in daily-dose containers from their local Wal-Mart!)  Source*

 Claire Wolfe: Land-mine legislation

Claire Wolfe: Future Felons of America

7 posted on 12/03/2002 10:52:36 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: omegatoo; 2sheep; Prodigal Daughter
No mention of babies. Curious.

Out of 2000 births, it seems highly unlikely that no babies would have died. Run a search on U.S. infant mortality. Now, was the mortality rate with this midwife unusually high? That is extremely doubtful, since what got her into this mess was the fact that she accompianied the patient to the hospital when a problem arose. Since she never lost a mother, she is apparently skilled at determining when a trip to the hospital is needed.

8 posted on 12/04/2002 5:42:06 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Out of 2000 births, it seems highly unlikely that no babies would have died. Run a search on U.S. infant mortality.

Infant mortality statistics in the U.S. are skewed by inclusion of drug, alcohol and tobacco-using mothers. If this midwive delivered Mennonite babies, their statistics may be better than average for maternal and neonatal health.

This midwife seems to know her business and to rely on power from above in her ministry. She has my support. This judge lacks wisdom. He does not seem to be relying on the same source as this midwife for his vocational direction.

9 posted on 12/04/2002 6:30:29 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: happygrl; 2sheep; Prodigal Daughter
Infant mortality statistics in the U.S. are skewed by inclusion of drug, alcohol and tobacco-using mothers. If this midwive delivered Mennonite babies, their statistics may be better than average for maternal and neonatal health.

True enough. Also, it may be that this community has more types of births that naturally end in the babies' deaths, for the types of defects that others may seek abortions for. IOW, women knowingly carry sick babies to term and let the Lord determine the outcome, or they do not go through a zillion screening tests to discover abnormalities, since they would not abort anyway. Overall, these problems are probably pretty rare and the community is healthier than average.

She surely knows her business, and it being persecuted for honesty. She is a responsible person, letting the hospital know what drugs the patient had been given. Otherwise they may have inadvertantly OD'd her. It really is a testament to her skills that no mothers have been lost. There are a variety of problems that can put the mother at risk, and obviously she knows how to handle them, which includes knowing when a trip to the hospital is in order. It seems to me that the midwife horror stories happen when outside help is not considered an option. I wonder how many of those refusals are the parents' wishes, and not because of incompetence by the midwife.

What would have happened if the midwife said nothing about the Pitocin, and the mother died from complications directly related to the hospital's lack of knowledge? The patient's health was obviously more important to the midwife, than getting in trouble for 'practicing medicine without a license". She had to know it was not exactly legal, but I suspect that most of the time, the hospital staff leave the midwives alone. Some zero-tolerance do-gooder liberal nurse or doctor ratted her out, that's my opinion.

10 posted on 12/04/2002 7:13:26 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
> She surely knows her business, and it being persecuted for honesty.

~~~

Ps 34:21 Evil shall slay the wicked: and they that hate the righteous shall be desolate.
22 The LORD redeemeth the soul of his servants: and none of them that trust in him shall be desolate.

Pr 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

11 posted on 12/04/2002 12:18:08 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Many states license midwives, and they do wonderful jobs. In her state however, what she is doing is illegal. She is practicing medicine without a license. The people of her state should work to change the laws so she can legally do what she does. Until then she is breaking the law. Her intentions do not matter, her outcomes do not matter. After all, it is ultimately "only about sex" right?

O2
12 posted on 12/04/2002 5:44:43 PM PST by omegatoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson