Posted on 12/04/2002 9:06:59 AM PST by stylin_geek
What Andrew Jackson can teach Al Gore about beating Bush in 2004.
Al Gore wants a rematch. Pundits are already discounting his chances at beating George W. Bush in 2004—not without good reason, given his reported 19 percent favorable rating. But a historical fact bodes well for Gore: On six occasions, a defeated presidential candidate ran four years later against the man who beat him—and four times the challenger won. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson ousted President John Adams in their rematch. Like father, like son: President John Quincy Adams lost to Andrew Jackson in their 1828 reprise. William Henry Harrison won his second race against President Martin Van Buren in 1840. His grandson, President Benjamin Harrison, lost his second campaign against Grover Cleveland in 1892. (The two-time losers: William Jennings Bryan twice lost to William McKinley, and Adlai Stevenson fell to Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956.) Click here to see the electoral and popular vote results from each election.
So, what can Gore learn from his phoenix-like predecessors?
Like three of the successful presidential comeback artists—Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland—Gore lost the presidency by a hair's breadth the first time around. Like Jackson and Cleveland, he actually won the popular vote. And like Jackson, he can legitimately argue that had it not been for dirty dealing in the post-Election Day politicking, he would have been president.
It's too late, however, for Gore to heed the main lesson of Jackson's 1828 comeback: Mobilize popular outrage at having been robbed. In 1824, a four-way race ended with no one commanding a majority of electoral votes (as constitutionally required for election), and the contest went to the House. Henry Clay, who had finished fourth, threw his support to John Quincy Adams, the runner-up, denying Jackson—the first-place finisher in both popular and electoral votes—what he considered his rightful victory. Adams then made Clay secretary of state.
Never one to acquiesce meekly, Jackson decried a "corrupt bargain" and began the rematch immediately. His boosters attacked Adams as illegitimate. He cultivated journalists, kept a high profile, and encouraged grass-roots activity, including the formation of local "Hickory Clubs." Judging from the tide that swept him into the White House four years later, one can almost imagine the public marching on Washington to install Jackson as chief executive if the insiders' electoral politicking had again gone awry.
Gore is hardly in the image of Old Hickory, but he might look to Cleveland, who was bounced from the White House in 1888 despite winning the popular vote in his bid for a second term. Before he even left the White House, the lame-duck Cleveland was laying the groundwork for a return: Although he had governed conservatively, his last State of the Union message rang with rousing blasts at the plutocrats of the Gilded Age and the deepening immiseration of the working class—rhetoric geared toward amassing popular goodwill. On leaving the White House, First Lady Frances Cleveland told the staff to mind the furnishings since, "We are coming back, just four years from today."
But like Gore, Cleveland disappeared after leaving office. He was emboldened to run again only when—and here Gore will have to keep searching for an auspicious precedent—the Democrats fared well in the 1890 midterm elections against the pro-business, GOP-controlled "billion-dollar Congress." Two years later, Cleveland picked off a few key states to defeat President Benjamin Harrison, bringing a Democratic Congress with him.
Another route to a successful challenge has been for the loser to establish himself as the undisputed leader of his party—which, despite his failure to do so in 2001 or this fall, may still be possible for Gore. While serving as vice president to John Adams (who had narrowly defeated him in 1796), Jefferson managed to secure his place at the helm of the Democrat-Republican Party. Jefferson aided his party's candidates; urged backers such as James Madison to publish articles supporting him; wrote his friends "private" political missives whose contents were meant to find their way into print; and shored up alliances, notably with his 1796 running-mate Aaron Burr of New York, a state that had gone to Adams.
Most important, Jefferson assumed the mantle as his party's public philosopher. When Adams drew fire for the Alien and Sedition Acts—potentially unconstitutional measures that allowed the deportation or prosecution of the president's critics—Jefferson drafted and championed the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions challenging the restrictive laws. Although his position as vice president forced him to do so secretly, he defined the issues at stake in the next election, allowing him to eke out a slim victory over the incumbent Adams.
In addition to Jefferson, both Jackson and William Henry Harrison bolstered their reprise efforts by building superior party organizations while out of power. The 1824 corrupt bargain had ended the so-called Era of Good Feelings, the brief interval in which the nation's original political parties had atrophied in significance. After his loss, Andrew Jackson not only mended fences with John Calhoun (one of his three rivals from 1824), but also aligned with New York power-broker Martin Van Buren and Virginia leader Thomas Ritchie to solidify a coalition for 1828. That coalition marked the birth of the Democratic Party.
Similarly, William Henry Harrison, known as "Tippecanoe" for his heroics in a famed battle against Indian tribes, benefited from a stronger Whig Party in his 1840 victory. In 1836 the Whigs, still embryonic, held no national convention and instead nominated three separate regional candidates, ensuring defeat for all of them. Yet Harrison ran surprisingly well in the West, even as the Democrat Van Buren, as vice president, coasted to the White House as Jackson's heir. During the next four years, the Whigs borrowed a page from the Democrats and got organized: At their first national convention, in December 1839, a diverse group of key politicos joined forces to block the nomination of the controversial Henry Clay in favor of the popular Tippecanoe.
Harrison also pioneered in 1840 the modern technique of reinventing his image through his canny use of the media. Challenging the Democrats' reputation as the party of the common people, the Whigs downplayed Harrison's aristocratic lineage—his father had signed the Declaration of Independence—and portrayed him as a "log-cabin, hard-cider" candidate, a plain-living rustic from the Ohio frontier. In contrast, they castigated Van Buren—an ethnic New Yorker who grew up poor and had heartfelt democratic impulses—for using gold spoons in the executive mansion and traveling in a gilded coach. Harrison won handily.
Gore, alas, already suffers from a perceived excess of self-reinvention. A last option available to him, then, might be one that also served Jefferson, Jackson, William Harrison, and Cleveland: Wait for disaster to befall the incumbent. Second-time losers John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, and Benjamin Harrison all struggled as president. In particular, all were vulnerable to attack as feckless aristocrats unwilling or unable to address urgent needs. Van Buren did little to tackle a terrible depression. The well-born, dandyish Harrison seemed indifferent to the Gilded Age's rising economic inequality, which pushed farmers and laborers into militancy. Their opponents (like Gore) were hardly classic men of the people, but it was the incumbents who bore the brunt of popular unrest.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.msn.com ...
William Jennings Bryan twice lost to William McKinleyI rock.
Nothing. The man is incapable of even learning from himself. And this article contains so many false premises that it's pointless to debunk them. More people have read that article in this thread than will ever read it at its source.
Michael
He holds no office... and is doomed like King Lear to wander about aimlessly.
The writer of this article sounds a little light-in-the-loafers.
I wonder if that 19% who approve of Algore, are buying his books?
>>>Has there ever been a bigger loser in American Politics, EVER???
Williams Jennings Bryant and Adeli Stevenson come to mind. Gore's in good company.
2 posted on 11/27/2002 11:56 PM MST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.