Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Remedy
Remind me again why the U.S. supreme court is allowed to display the Decalogue but the Alabama court isn't?
2 posted on 12/09/2002 12:16:40 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
The Ten Commandments Monument Opinion

The monument in the Alabama State Judicial Building is, therefore, dramatically different from other Ten Commandments displays in other government buildings and on other government land across the country. It is different from such displays as:

(1) Moses, among other historical lawgivers, holding two blank tablets on the East Portico of the United States Supreme Court Building;

 (2) a carving of two tablets with the numbers I through X on the entrance door to the United States Supreme Court's courtroom;

 

In each of these displays, the Ten Commandments are situated in a secular context and the secular nature of the display is apparent and dominant.

In a mural on the United States Supreme Court building, the Ten Commandments are displayed as two blank tablets, held by Moses sitting amongst many other historical lawgivers. The Commandments displayed on the door to the Supreme Court's courtroom are so small as to be almost unnoticeable, are among many other decorations such as a lion's head and a head of wheat, and are simply two tablets containing the Roman numerals I through X.


 

 

 


 

 

IMPEACHING FEDERAL JUDGES:A COVENANTAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO JUDICIAL TYRANNY

To put the proper bounds on Ford's statement one should consider the remarks made before the American Bar Association by William Taft, the only man to serve the United States as both President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court:

Under the authoritative construction by the highest court of impeachment, the Senate of the United States, a high misdemeanor for which a judge may be removed is misconduct involving bad faith or wantoness [sic] or recklessness in his judicial actions, or in the use of his official influence for ulterior purposes. By the liberal interpretation of the term "high misdemeanor" which the Senate has given there is now no difficulty in securing the removal of a judge for any reason that shows him unfit.

 

IMPEACH Judge Thompson!

 

 

 

3 posted on 12/09/2002 8:43:39 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson