MORE HOMOSEXUAL POLITICIANS REVEAL NEW FACE OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY

News Release from Campaign for California Families ^ | December 3, 2002 | Campaign for California Families

[Man of the Right]

We haven't seen anything yet.

I believe that marriage is a sacrament.

Conversely, the left belives in moral relativism -- the notion that any value is as valid as any other value. In 1972, the then-front runner for the Democrat nomination, Muskie, refused to support gay rights. Today, gays are a key Democrat constituency, and support for legalization of gay marriage is a mainstream Democrat plank. The Democrats insist they do not support pedophilia, bestiality, or necrophilia, but that lack of support is based not on principle, or moral or religious doctrine, but on the fact supporters have not yet organized to become important Democrat constituencies. Once they do, Democrats will demand toddler marriage, livestock marriage, yes, even trans-death marriage. They will proslytize these values to our children in the public schools at our expense and they will force heterosexual marriage between adults underground, based on separation of church and state.

My question is the Republican campaign slogan of 1946: Have you had enough? I've had enough.

[Darksheare]

You summed it all up.

[onedoug]

"...should go a long way towards demolishing a lot of the myths and ignorance about homosexuality."

Such as? If one might ask.

[mg39]

""...should go a long way towards demolishing a lot of the myths and ignorance about homosexuality.""

"Such as? If one might ask."

One may.

1. That they target children.
2. That gay sex = AIDS/disease
3. That it is a choice, and not a genetic mandate.

[onedoug]

Hmm.

Not to argue, but would you take a look at #46? Particularly its latter section, MORAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL QUESTIONS, with regard to your #3.

Moreover, I think the author's point about the sexual revolution wrought by Judaism as anchoring Western civilization is quite compelling, whether one is a "believer", or not. And if that can be borne out, then it's difficult to see that what "deviates" from such underpinnings does not contribute to Western civilization's decline.

[Darksheare]

Yes, they DO target children.
Gay sex DOES promote the spread of aids and Hepatitus C as well as other diseases.
And YES, it IS a choice.
There is NO CREDIBLE proof that it is genetic. They've reached so far to 'prove' that one that they say even the length of your ring finger determines your sexual orientation.

Like I said, for one trying to preach tolerance and enlightenment, you're awfully intolerant and being mighty ignorant.

[Clemenza]

Really? I thought the 14th Amendment merely extended the rights provided by the constitution (free speech, right to bear arms, FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY!) to the states. Of course, legislation and court decisions by leftist justices have "reinterpreted" the 14th Amendment, but such is life.

OK, we've decided that the lavender lobby deserves "special protection." As a vegetarian, I am SICK AND TIRED about how we are depicted in the media and by "right wing bigots" like that Ted Nugent fella. Where is MY civil rights act?

Oh yeah, I forgot, I DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT OTHERS THINK ABOUT MY LIFESTYLE CHOICE. This is in contrast to the gaystapo (mg39 included?), who seek to shove their lifestyle down others throats, even when said people have legitimate moral objections of conscience.

Again, may I suggest the ACT-UP or Democrats Underground websites?

[I_Love_My_Husband]

homo agenda ping