Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Arbuthnot
Well, there's some interesting information in this. I didn't realize that Lott will have to be selected again in January. The pubbies need to take him aside and convince him to remove his name from the running. He could be offered a plum position on one of the committees and could look very gracious and contrite by stepping aside himself and not ending up losing the vote. That way he could remain in the senate, work on getting his reputation back, and still be a useful senator.
6 posted on 12/11/2002 8:38:04 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: McGavin999
"Lott is unfit to run the Senate." We've had abundant evidence of that for quite awhile. This was just more evidence.
12 posted on 12/11/2002 9:08:55 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: McGavin999
I didn't realize that Lott will have to be selected again in January.

Actually, Lott was elected to be GOP Leader in late October for the upcoming Senate session. Conason is wrong about this.

As he is about Lott in general.

Please, don't tell me you're in with the likes of Joe Conason! Lott may have to be replaced, but it should be by his GOP cohorts, not by lynch mobs led by the likes of a knuckle-dragger like Joe Conason.

17 posted on 12/11/2002 9:20:31 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson