To: dansangel
((((PING))))
2 posted on
12/17/2002 1:37:51 AM PST by
.45MAN
To: JohnHuang2
Wal-Mart's company policy, which is stricter than state law on child exploitation, does not allow print pictures of any male or female in a state of undress that would be forbidden on a public streetI suspect thats an inaccurate statement as NYS law allows women to be top free.
To: JohnHuang2; Mulder
Now she is suing Wal-Mart for humiliation and invasion of privacyGood for her! My parents had "blackmail" photos of me as a toddler in our backyard pool. It did keep me in-line, for a while...well, until I met Mulder. lol ;-)
5 posted on
12/17/2002 3:21:40 AM PST by
Scully
To: JohnHuang2
This is not exactly child porn! Now, where are those baby pictures of me on that bear skin rug?
6 posted on
12/17/2002 5:44:39 AM PST by
tob2
To: dd5339; cavtrooper21
Another reason to buy a digital camera!
8 posted on
12/17/2002 6:45:49 AM PST by
Vic3O3
To: JohnHuang2
I was going to get upset, then I saw it was WND. Therefore, the whole story might well be made up.
9 posted on
12/17/2002 10:59:17 AM PST by
Illbay
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson