Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article



1 posted on 12/22/2002 8:27:03 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FL_engineer
This explains the yellow spot next to my PC.
2 posted on 12/22/2002 8:29:04 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FL_engineer
Sorry, couldn't resist.
3 posted on 12/22/2002 8:30:04 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry
Ping!
4 posted on 12/22/2002 8:30:27 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FL_engineer
Wow. The future is coming in a flood.
5 posted on 12/22/2002 8:51:58 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FL_engineer
That must have been one BIG mouse.
6 posted on 12/22/2002 10:32:14 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FL_engineer
If the feat can be repeated in humans, it will allow doctors to replace damaged organs without the need for a donor. This writer obviously doesn't consider a 'fetus' (latin for child) an individual human being thus there is 'no donor'. Therapeutic cloning will be the insertion of a patient's nuclear material into the de-nucleated egg from a donor, then a static charge will begin a gestation of individual life (but not a human life since the 'scientists' never intend to allow the gestating life to come to full term before being 'harvested' for parts). At the time when tissues have differentiated sufficiently for identification the fetus will be terminated and the tissues harvested for treatment of the parent of the clone.

The trick will be to take cells from the patient in need of a kidney and grow a kidney without going into the fetal stage. That would be cloning of a sort without cannibalizing.

7 posted on 12/22/2002 10:44:17 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FL_engineer
This is one of those things that hits home personally. My father is very ill, his one kidney has pretty much failed and we are delaying dialisis. Here is my question to all the freepers out there. Would you support or oppose a "Implied Consent" law. Basically, on the back of your drivers licience, it gives you the option to be an organ donor, if you don't fill it out, your not. What I want is the reverse, that you automatically are an organ donor and you have the option to opt out on the back of the card. What do you Freepers think about this? I know at least one or two european countries already do this. I do not know how there systems work though.
8 posted on 12/22/2002 11:04:41 PM PST by Sonny M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson