Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I think this explaination pretty well ties-up all the loose ends. I know the part about the 17th amendment is correct. Whaddya'all think?
1 posted on 12/29/2002 10:49:45 AM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: abner; AGreatPer; Angelwood; bmwcyle; BrucefromMtVernon; BufordP; Congressman Billybob; ...
PINGS )))))))
2 posted on 12/29/2002 11:11:59 AM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RFP; 4ConservativeJustices; billbears
Makes ya think...
3 posted on 12/29/2002 11:16:42 AM PST by Ff--150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RFP
"This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today "

WHAT ACT?

Acts have titles, when someone refuses to name the Act he is IMO a kook trying to fool stupid people who won't look up the language of the Act themselves.

Is he referring to "H. R. 591. An act relating to habeas corpus, and regulating judicial proceedings in certain cases"?
It reads: "...During the existance of this rebellion the president shall be, and is hereby, invested with authority to declare the suspension of the privilege of habeas corpus"

I have no idea what lunatic point he is trying to make about ( I assume) the consciption act "S. 511. An act for enrolling and calling out the national forces, and for other purposes".

Kook city IMO.

4 posted on 12/29/2002 12:25:15 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson