His knee-jerk anti-Bushism is junvenile, but then he enthusiastically endorses Havel's parroting of the Bush line on anti-terrorism.
Maybe he is hedging his bets so he can make sure and keep his name on the welcome lists at the NY cocktail party circuit. Gutless.
That is certainly the opposite of any accurate description of American 'liberals', for whom stealing and destroying conservative campus newspapers is considered to be a laudable act, who go out of their way to disparage America's religious people, and who despise virtually anything that promotes commerce.
It would be amusing, if it weren't so pathetic, that so many leftists whose deeply-held beliefs were put into practice in the Soviet Union and in East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and other Iron Curtain countries seem to identify with the freedom-loving people who brought down the Berlin wall and tore down the apparatus of State power, rather than with the tyrants, nomenklatura, and apparatchiks who are their natural comrades in word, thought, and deed.
And now, if you will allow me, I will at last try to gain some distance from myself and attempt to formulate three of my old certainties, or rather my old observations, that my time in the world of high politics has only confirmed:(1) If humanity is to survive and avoid new catastrophes, then the global political order has to be accompanied by a sincere and mutual respect among the various spheres of civilization, culture, nations, or continents, and by honest efforts on their part to seek and find the values or basic moral imperatives they have in common, and to build them into the foundations of their coexistence in this globally connected world.
(2) Evil must be confronted in its womb and, if there is no other way to do it, then it has to be dealt with by the use of force. If the immensely sophisticated and expensive modern weaponry must be used, let it be used in a way that does not harm civilian populations. If this is not possible, then the billions spent on those weapons will be wasted.
(3) If we examine all the problems facing the world today, be they economic, social, ecological, or general problems of civilization, we will always --whether we want to or not--come up against the problem of whether a course of action is proper or not, or whether, from the long-term planetary point of view, it is responsible. The moral order and its sources, human rights and the sources of people's right to human rights, human responsibility and its origins, human conscience and the penetrating view of that from which nothing can be hidden with a curtain of noble words--these are, in my deepest convictions and in all my experience, the most important political themes of our time.
Dear friends, when I look around me and see so many famous people who appear to have descended from somewhere up there in the starry heavens, I cannot help feeling that at the end of my long fall from a fairy-tale world onto the hard earth, I suddenly find myself once more inside a fairy tale. There is perhaps only one difference: now I can appreciate this feeling more than I was able to in similar circumstances thirteen years ago.
ROFL! That had me laughing for five minutes. I love the sounds of socialists howling in pain.
Of course the rest of the article is BS. It was Vaclav Havel who said that the Achilles heel of Communism was the constant and massive lying, and that "living in truth" was the path to vanquishing totalitarianism. Remnick, OTOH, is a Clinton groupie. Enough said.