To: Devil_Anse
Your point is well taken, however I was just reminded of this case and saw a comparison which you so eloquently pointed out the differences. I just thought post # 12 was an interesting dillemma for a jury to decide.
Would you agree with the jury in that case - deciding to let them both go? I think marajade spun out of answering my question directly, but you as a juror (or possibly a defendant) - what would you decide?
52 posted on
01/05/2003 6:30:17 PM PST by
M. Peach
To: M. Peach
If there wasn't the evidence to tie either one of them to the killing, yes, they should be found not guilty.
I wouldn't think they'd be tried together, though.
I appreciate the courteous manner of your reply.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson