Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Milltownmalbay
The nine states overall are skewed to the pro life position, particularly if weighted for population. The poll is worthless. Even pro choice New Hampshire is only marginally so. Still, I think the pro lifers have a slight edge overall in voters who really swing their votes on this issue. But that advantage is a marginal one. The GOP pays a heavy price in upscale suburbs.
4 posted on 01/06/2003 9:32:15 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
The GOP pays a heavy price in upscale suburbs.

That's because they haven't figured out how to play their cards right.

The fact is that the vast majority of the population favor tighter restrictions on abortion than exist now, but a largely-overlapping vast majority do not, today, favor restrictions as tight as what the most pro-life groups seek. Many of the people in the overlapping segment are, for example, strongly opposed to abortion restrictions on rape and incest victims, but favor restrictions on late-term and "partial-birth" abortions.

If the Republicans were smart, they would work to grab the votes of this very large segment of the population which is currently being courted, quite successfully, by the Democrats. Push hard for the restrictions that the vast majority of people want, while holding off on those that people don't yet want, and move forward from there.

Does anyone see any problem whatsoever with my strategy? Any idea why Republicans can't figure it out?

15 posted on 01/06/2003 11:23:28 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson