Posted on 01/08/2003 11:49:46 AM PST by Inyokern
A few minutes ago, Buchanan and Press interviewed British MP George Galloway regarding his views on Iraq. Galloway, naturally, was against any military action against Saddam Hussein. Buchanan seemed to cheer him on.
Strangely, Pat Buchanan gave no indication whatsoever that George Galloway is perhaps the farthest left and most anti-American member of the British parliament (and that is quite and accomplishment).
Check out this link on Galloway:
http://www.thekafir.co.uk/galloway.htm
Frankly, I don't shive a git what your cup of tea is, s**tbird.
For "America First" Buchanan to have Galloway on is breathtaking. What is even more astonishing is how people are rushing to defend him.
Regards, Ivan
First of all, anyone who watches Hannity and Colmes knows very well who Susan Estrich is and knows that Hannity disagrees with her on most issues.
Secondly, most Buchanan and Press viewers are NOT familiar with who George Galloway is. They do not know he is a rabid leftist and America-hater. And they got no hint of that from Buchanan's fawning interview.
I agree on both counts. Buchanan seemed friendlier to the America-hater Galloway than to George W. Bush. I found it incredible.
What should he have done, introduced him as 'a rabid leftist and American hater'? I think not, Pat is a class act and always the gentleman.
Personally I don't want to be preconditioned when listening to an interview. All I want are the 'opinions' and 'reasons'. Let the viewers decide my friend, not you,Ivan or Poohbah!
Operation Allied Farce was a silly excuse of a war. I don't think that an International Tribunal should judge Milosevic, I'd leave that to the good folk of Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Montenegro.
Would you mind explaining the relevance of your question?
I think this sympathetic interview with Galloway proves that Buchanan's alliance with Lenora Fulani was not a fluke. Buchanan has no problem making common cause with the left. He is no conservative.
Pat is one a very few 'pundits', 'commentators' that takes this position. On other issues, past and current, he's right on, much more than off. Hardly can you say, he's off his rocker.
SFW?
Seems you're not to keen on Pat.
Due to his cozying up to leftists and the enemies of America, I lump Pat with the leftists and enemies of America. I merely give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he has some mental disorder, as opposed to being consciously evil.
Sounds like a major contradiction on your part.
No, it isn't.
Exactly who do you think are 'conservatives'? McCain, Spector, Olympia, Kristol, Safire? All of the Democrats and most of the Republicans are preaching NWO first, US sovereignty second. Hence comes the term 'neo conservative'.
It must have been good interview, in that Pat didn't 'opiniate'. Object of an interview is to find out what the 'interviewee' thinks. We all know what Pat thinks, as he one of few that is a straight talker in his columns and on the air. And as a bonus he's right on the 'facts' all the time, and most of the time the time on the analysis of the facts. A real God sent, especially in this piont of 'history'. He would make a better 'newspaper' of record than the cruddy New York Times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.