Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alpowolf
There was judicial review- the 54 page ruling that is the subject of this article.

This ruling itself says that there must be judicial review of any detentions.

You really should read the ruling.

39 posted on 01/10/2003 9:35:34 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
The case is not a judicial review of the charges against Hamdi (are there any charges?), but rather a ruling on whether he is entitled to the Constitutional rights of a citizen. Clearly this court does not think so.
41 posted on 01/10/2003 10:20:55 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson