They claim Biblical refrences to the beast and then as proof present Esau! (paraphrase) "Who was hairy, a hunter and liked remote places"
I have never seen a more absurd attempt to legitimize something in my entire life.. It also implies a kind of beastality between the "Sons of God and earthly women"
Religious FReepers will just be shocked.
What is it ? You claim the Bible as absolute authority, then pick and choose which sections are applicable ? Keep in mind, when America was "discovered", a few centuries ago, biblical scholars were at a total loss to explain the existence of American Indians.
On what basis would you conclude the (alleged) Bigfoot was a cross between a human and a non-human ? Appearance ? Hairy-ness ? What some earnest Preacher shouted while in the pulpit ?