That being the case, I doubt 1) it would have passed peer review muster for publication in the British Medical Journal and 2) other studies would confirm it.
That being the case, I doubt 1) it would have passed peer review muster for publication in the British Medical Journal and 2) other studies would confirm it.
Your arguments from authority do not trump simple logic. (And be aware that many scientists, while adequate number-crunchers or instrument-readers, are less than Einsteins when it comes to drawing conclusions from their results---especially when certain sorts of conclusions can get them a spot in the limelight.)