To: listenhillary
The article fails to note that the "riot" was a noisy protest over the DEMOCRATS locking themselves away from the public and attempting to conduct a SECRET ballot count in violation of Floridian election laws.
3 posted on
01/14/2003 6:15:24 PM PST by
Poohbah
(USMC, 1983-1991)
To: Poohbah; listenhillary
Compare and contrast with the 1968 Chicago riots, where Larry Niven's first two laws were generated and subjected to a field test.
Niven's Law #1: Never throw s**t at an armed person. (The protestors were throwing sandwich bags filled with s**t at the cops.)
Niven's Law #2: Never stand NEXT to an idiot who is throwing s**t at an armed person.
4 posted on
01/14/2003 6:17:25 PM PST by
Poohbah
(USMC, 1983-1991)
To: Poohbah
The site is just another example of the pathetic far left journalist's bath house.
5 posted on
01/14/2003 6:21:12 PM PST by
gaspar
To: Poohbah
"The article fails to note that the "riot" was a noisy protest over the DEMOCRATS locking themselves away from the public and attempting to conduct a SECRET ballot count in violation of Floridian election laws."Absolutely right. Who knows how many votes the Democrats would have stolen in the planned closed door session had these people not "rioted". These "rioters" prevented vote fraud, and they should be lauded for taking an action which in my opinion is on par with the Boston Tea Party.
19 posted on
01/14/2003 7:51:23 PM PST by
yooper
To: Poohbah
If that's what they call a riot, wait 'til they try that crap again. Besides I thought the Supreme Court put Bush in the WH.
26 posted on
01/14/2003 9:22:06 PM PST by
Let's Roll
(Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson