Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
How well I remember this weekend.

Me too.

Drudge was being sued by Sidney Blumenthal. The GOP was on its last leg. Clinton was at the peak of power, on the verge of an unstoppable socialist agenda. We were headed into the Dark Ages.

Then Drudge posted his historic scoop on Saturday night and changed everything.

My in-laws were visiting during that weekend and we were having breakfast on Sunday morning. As we enjoyed our eggs and bacon, the topic of Clinton came up and we were having the usual debate. And I mentioned - by the way, Matt Drudge ran a story last night that Clinton is having sex with one of his interns.

Oh, you can't believe anything Drudge prints, they said. Don't be so sure, I replied.

A few days later, after Pete Baker's article in the Washington Post, they were having second thoughts. Maybe Drudge was right after all.

The amazing thing about Clinton's impeachment was the series of improbable events that led to it. If any one of them had not occurred, he would not have been impeached.

If Clinton had not dropped his pants and wagged his privates at Paula Jones years earlier, he would not have been impeached.

If Matt Drudge hadn't gotten a job at the CBS gift shop in Hollywood - no impeachment.

If Clinton hadn't dripped on his young intern's blue dress - no impeachment.

Clinton did get one lucky break - the bogus Danny Williams story. That helped to save him from conviction in the Senate.

8 posted on 01/15/2003 8:45:29 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
So true!

Matt has earned his place his history, by publishing stories that the mainstream media didn't want to touch. I read both Isikoff's "Uncovering Clinton" and Drudge's "Drudge Manifesto", and found an interesting parallel description of that whole episode, from both sides. And Drudge continues to be a trusted, confidential "alternative" to the mainstream press, because he treats people squarely - gotta respect that.
9 posted on 01/15/2003 8:52:08 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
One small point: the Danny Williams story was never decided one way or another. President Clinton's DNA was never released except in scrambled form.
12 posted on 01/15/2003 10:10:02 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Clinton did get one lucky break - the bogus Danny Williams story. That helped to save him from conviction in the Senate.

Who says that was a lucky break? Wasn't the Danny WIlliams story run by one of the tabloids owned by the Evercore outfit run by Friend of Bill Altman?

20 posted on 01/15/2003 11:11:05 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson