Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: razorback-bert
I never understood why these big pension funds don't just buy an S&P index, a bond index, and a little gold on a regular, cost averaged basis basis. Allocate it, say, 60% stocks, 30% bonds, and 10% gold.

That way you'd avoid a management fee, take advantage of the long term rewards of stocks, and have a nice hedge.

That's what I would do, anyway, with a big pension fund.

4 posted on 01/16/2003 9:45:04 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
60% stocks is too high for a working pension fund, IMHO. I think the pension managers got caught up in the "artificial exuberance" of the late 1990's, and it came back to bite them (and the taxpayers). What's apparent to them now is that it "isn't different" this time.
5 posted on 01/17/2003 6:20:01 AM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson