Posted on 01/22/2003 10:22:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
America has turned its back on Americans. Even illegal aliens count higher with the American government than native-born, taxpaying, loyal U.S. citizens, who are regarded by their government as nothing but resources to be exploited.
American taxpayers now are expected to shoulder the burden of paying for university educations for illegal aliens. When U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, said recently that illegal aliens should be deported, not given in-state tuition, Karl Rove, the Power Behind the Bush, told Mr. Tancredo never again to darken the steps of the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
Just an observation dirt, but you seem to want to carry Clinton's water on Kyoto.
Just an observation, Dane, but you're hardly a reliable authority on truthful posting. If you're chiming in on Southack's side, then I KNOW I'm correct.
Yes, that's **precisely** what I'm saying.
Clinton's EO's had private contractors showing Kyoto target goal compliance (in order to win certain federal contracts).
Clinton's EO's had our federal agencies reducing their own energy emissions **as if** Kyoto had been ratified by our Senate.
Yes, that is precisely what I am saying and proving with the links that I provided, among others that are available.
And another thing, Dane, it's hardly carrying ANYONE's water to ask that posters substantiate their claims on any given subject, no matter who is involved. I know that's an alien concept, but wrestle with it for awhile and get back to me.
Clinton's EO's had private contractors showing Kyoto target goal compliance (in order to win certain federal contracts).
And that is not correct language. The companies' work on a given project had to meet certain ENERGY requirements for a given project - but the contractors themselves could spew all the CO2 they wanted into the atmosphere, which is counter to what you claimed: To win bids with federal agencies, companies were being compelled to show how they were in compliance with Kyoto's reduced CO2 requirements, for instance.
Which should have been written:
To win bids with federal agencies, companies were being compelled to show how specific governmental projects were in compliance with Kyoto's reduced CO2 requirements, for instance.
Oh well, all I can say is that I am not surprised that the knee jerk ad hominem side of dirtboy would come out when you are presented with the facts.
Thanks. That's a much more clear and precise way of stating my claim.
Yeppurs. From Pine Grove Furnace to Wilmington, DE. Now I'm only commuting a measly hour.
Before this life, I used to work in mid-town Manhattan for 17yrs, in advertising-marketing world, and commuted from Princeton, NJ, every day, and I thought that was hell on earth. Burned out at 39 and came out here to found/open a 20ac garden center and nursery; wildy successful beyond my dreams.
Congrats on your new life. That's beautiful country out there, and there are lots of folks moving up from Baltimore to keep ya busy.
At inflated prices, and only for pre-94 design firearms or post-94 design firearms that accept pre-94 design mags.
Have a grand old time working the computers in the DNC basement, Joe.
You a VC guy? I got ideas......
Dane, you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the nether regions, but thanks for trying to derail the subject. It is, after all, what you do best.
It rocks a little too much. Goes down a bit too easy, if ya know what I mean.
Uh dude, you derailed this thread with your ad hominem reply #122.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.