1 posted on
01/27/2003 7:25:22 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
Oh, that explains it. Let's sue the lead paint manufacturers.
To: blam
Just about anything can and will be used to prove that humans don't have control over their actions, and are not resposible for anything they do. I do think humans are more intelligent than animals and can control their actions.
To: blam
I'll give the delinquent a case of .357 lead poisoning.
Read the article? Bah.
6 posted on
01/27/2003 7:56:12 PM PST by
Dinsdale
To: blam
Wonder if he factored in the socio-economic status of the delinquents vs. the high school students. Like, maybe, being raised in a lower class welfare family could result in both exposure to lead and delinquent behaviour and being raised in a middle class working family could result in less lead exposure and better behaviour? These news reports never give enough details about a study to do anything other than accept the conclusion they present.
7 posted on
01/27/2003 7:56:43 PM PST by
templar
To: blam
Did anyone ever stop to think that lead paint has not been used in years and fluridation of water supplies started about the same time lead paint was discontenued?
9 posted on
01/27/2003 8:06:44 PM PST by
oyez
(Is this a great country...........Or what?)
To: blam
Y'mean my constant digging under the birdbath in the backyard even though I know I'll get in trouble for it is because of all those nifty mushroomed bullets I've been collecting from the police pistol range I'm also not supposed to be prowling on after I slip under the fence through the tunnel that's not supposed to be there...AND IT'S NOT MY FAULT ???...as in EXCUSE ?!!! COOL !!!!!!!
12 posted on
01/27/2003 8:28:37 PM PST by
PoorMuttly
("Ask not for whom the Muttly digs under the birdbath in the backyard...he digs for thee.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson