Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Is Running
www.newsmax.com ^ | 29 Jan 2003 | newsmax staff

Posted on 01/29/2003 6:49:47 AM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Oh yeah, of course, if it had of happened on 9-11-2000 he would have cancelled the elections. OK.
41 posted on 01/29/2003 8:13:27 AM PST by Guillermo (Sic 'Em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I don't believe there are enough celebrity worshippers in America to elect JFK jr even if he were alive-he will vote though, obviousely.
42 posted on 01/29/2003 8:14:59 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Ignorance ain't bliss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
If she won, what would we call Bill?

First Man?
First Gentleman (No possible way!)
First Philanderer?
First baggage?
Divorced?

43 posted on 01/29/2003 8:15:27 AM PST by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
All a matter of the economy. If job losses continue and businesses continue to flee the country, if the housing market tanks and interest rates rise, all of which seem likely, she is a threat in 04.
44 posted on 01/29/2003 8:15:34 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Age is no problem for witches-she could still be running when we are all dead.
45 posted on 01/29/2003 8:18:09 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Ignorance ain't bliss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
We can just keep on calling Bill what he is, but not in mixed company.
46 posted on 01/29/2003 8:20:50 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Ignorance ain't bliss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Time is on her side.

The longer she waits, the easier it will be to get elected.

A republican presidential candidate has not won the majority of votes since 1988, some 15 years ago.

The fact of the matter, is that the democrats increasingly got more votes in 1992, 1996, AND 2000!

Since 2000, a few million more latins, blacks, and asians have now got the vote.

Since 2000, a few million more former republican factory workers, computer programmers and engineers cannot find work.

In the meantime, 57,000 more immigrants come in each week from asia and latin america and most of them will be voting democrat.

Dont count on republicans winning the presidency forever while continually getting less votes than democrats.

Winning the electoral college while losing the popular vote, is not gonna happen in every election. The democrats have increasinly got more and more votes in 1992, 1996, and 2000. The demographic trends of latins, blacks, and asians say democrats will continue to outvote republicans increasingly in all future elections.

47 posted on 01/29/2003 8:21:12 AM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
He probably voted in the last election, being that most of the democratic votes are of dead people and paid off with cigarettes homeless folks.
48 posted on 01/29/2003 8:21:30 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
If dead democrats had a choice, they would vote Republican.
49 posted on 01/29/2003 8:35:14 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Ignorance ain't bliss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
The only thing Hillary's running is a microwave oven and a cold-bedroom.
50 posted on 01/29/2003 8:44:32 AM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash
I said the same thing weeks ago :) Wait 'til you see her sickeningly fake "humility" when she accepts the party's drafting of her (which she will orchestrate behind the scenes) and describes it as a humbling surprise.
51 posted on 01/29/2003 9:30:29 AM PST by Choozer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
You have to try to see how the liberals view things to discern whether she will run in 04 or 08. It is obvious that the Dems are desperate. They think we are at a crossroads. By their way of thinking, 08 is too late. They don't think the country can afford 4 more years of Bush. The fear he will succeed in changing too much. She thinks she is the only liberal with "the balls" to stop him.
52 posted on 01/29/2003 9:37:06 AM PST by Choozer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
You make a good case for her to run next year, especially about the fact that it'll be near impossible to 'keep herself relevant' until 2008.
53 posted on 01/29/2003 9:45:26 AM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Choozer
Hatellary Rodhamster is the queen in the Axis of Acorns ... bitter little nuts.
54 posted on 01/29/2003 9:47:24 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
>>Add in some disaster (pre-arranged?)that allows her to cast herself as a struggling but determined victim and she's in the race<<

They're polling divorce vs Arkancide right now, I bet.

55 posted on 01/29/2003 9:52:43 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
>>If she won, what would we call Bill?<<

Eliminating Bill is a critical part of the strategy.

If divorce puts her woman vote % above 56, she may let him live.

But if divorce has only +/- effects in the polls, Bill had better steer clear of Ft. Marcy Park.

56 posted on 01/29/2003 9:56:04 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Oooh, I cannot wait until she does run! I'm gonna work for her campaign here, and be the biggest screw-up EVER.
57 posted on 01/29/2003 9:56:32 AM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
I don't think Larry Nichols is a very credible source.

Carolyn

58 posted on 01/29/2003 10:04:49 AM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
She will not run, but she will allow herself to be drafted.

If she doesn't run, any rat candidate should remember what happened to Wellstone and Carnahan. She still has the Arkrazy mafia behind her clear the field of competitors for her to cake walk in.
59 posted on 01/29/2003 10:05:44 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Stop future Freepathons! Become a monthly donor! Only you can prevent Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Hillary wouldn't dream of running unless something happens to make Bush's popularity dip pretty low. She doesn't want to waste her chance. She'll wait until '08.
60 posted on 01/29/2003 10:08:47 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson