Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth
Interesting. Thanks. I love new ways of looking at things.

Heck, this is nothing new. Animal breeders have known about this stuff since forever.

For example, this is what dogbreedinfo.com has to say about the "Labradoodle": FAULTS: Yappy, highly strung, dominance/aggression, fearful/timid, aggressive toward other animals. Dogs showing any of these behaviors should not be bred.

IOW, you assume that the personality traits are inherited, and you take animals with bad traits out of the gene pool.

7 posted on 01/29/2003 9:10:53 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
IOW, you assume that the personality traits are inherited, and you take animals with bad traits out of the gene pool.

This has implications beyond animal breeding, if you take a good look at our inner cities. The "bad boy" gangbangers are fathering more than their share of babies...

25 posted on 01/29/2003 11:36:56 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (To see the ultimate evil, visit the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
What was new to me were two things.

That in the beginning the "domesticated" animals may have selected themselves by surviving because of human activity, like the wolves surviving on human waste/refuse, and humans didn't start from scratch when they began breeding animals.

That there may be some physical appearances that are linked to passivity, like white/spotted appearance and cowlick positioning.

That humans bred animals for traits they wanted is old news, but the two things above were new thoughts for me.

34 posted on 01/29/2003 7:37:29 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson