[Greybird]

Seriously, do not use the add keywords feature as a way to anonymously slam someone.

Does this include using them as a substitute for argument? Or as an implicit slam on someone for the choice of material solely or primarily chosen to spark discussion that he or she has made? And if not, in either case, why not?

And why do I find it hard to think that anyone really gives a damn about this? Especially when a piece doesn't hew to the prevailing viewpoints around here?

[dighton]

Awwwwwww, did they pick on Llewellyn? Here's a Band-Aid for his boo-boo.

[TruthNtegrity]

Now that I've learned that a reader can add keywords to a post - oh, the things I can think about doing.

This is just all too much fun.

[BlueLancer]

"...And if not, in either case, why not?"

And, if so, in neither case, why? And, if not so, in neither case, why so not so? And, if so, in either case, why not so so? And, if so not, in either neither case, does a Møøse sh*t in the woods?

Answer: only if it can't find the porta-potty.