Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worried New Jerseyans Expect Doctors Not To Be In
NYTimes ^ | 1/30/03 | ROBERT HANLEY, MARIA NEWMAN

Posted on 01/30/2003 4:59:54 PM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
New Jersey's trial lawyers are adamantly opposed to any such cap, and Mr. McGreevey has expressed sympathy with lawyers' opposition to curbs on victims' rights to sue doctors for serious medical mistakes.

Apparently, California has the cap - and it seems to work very well.

1 posted on 01/30/2003 4:59:54 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
sue doctors for serious medical mistakes.

A different story than 'sue doctors for poor medical outcomes' which is what is happening now.

There is a huge difference.

2 posted on 01/30/2003 5:05:20 PM PST by RJCogburn (I mean to.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If I needed critical care from MY doctor and he wasn't availabe to tend to my needs Monday because of his protest, he would need care from a physician as soon as I was able to beat his A$$. Even worth losing my right to weapons for assult as passed by senile,brain damaged (now) Lautenberg.
They must have forgotton the oath taken at graduation .
3 posted on 01/30/2003 5:15:24 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
How about capping lawyers awards, 10% or 200 dollars an hour, whichever is less.

It's not right for these lawyers to win life's lotteries from other people's misery. They are just greedy people. They don't need all that money. The government should stop these rich trial lawyers. (That would be the solution if trial lawyers supported Republicans).

4 posted on 01/30/2003 5:23:16 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hmmm, Doctors or lawyers: which would you rather live without?
5 posted on 01/30/2003 5:40:46 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade
So your doctor is your slave, now?


This will teach you for refusing to work for a loss, Doctor!!!

6 posted on 01/30/2003 6:11:24 PM PST by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
I would like to live without lawyers. It used to be an honorable profession, but these days lawyers are without morals and seem to be extremely greedy.
7 posted on 01/30/2003 6:31:14 PM PST by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
As a tech worker degreed in electrical engineering....I tell my children that there are two professions that can either kill you or bankrupt you(or send you to the BIG HOUSE)....doctors and lawyers.....and to avoid both.
8 posted on 01/30/2003 6:39:39 PM PST by Johnny Crab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Margaret Johnston, 68, of Union, said she heard about the potential work stoppage yesterday and quickly arranged to see her doctor on Friday.

"I don't really have any serious ailments, but I just want to be on the safe side in case they stop working for a while," she said.

Unbelievable.

It would be interesting to check the death rates if the doctors walk out. I seem to remember a doctor walkout in California a while back where the death rate went down when the docs were on strike.

9 posted on 01/30/2003 6:53:00 PM PST by Auntie Mame (Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry.--Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
If any doctor calls for a policeman, tell them the police are not in today.
10 posted on 01/30/2003 6:55:09 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renegade
They must have forgotton the oath taken at graduation .

If the oath is, "First, do no harm," then if they don't see you they can't do any harm to you. So in a sense, not practicing their profession is living up to their oath.

I only hope your diatribe was rhetorical because if you really meant what you said, you're on the wrong website.

11 posted on 01/30/2003 6:57:18 PM PST by Auntie Mame (Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry.--Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
rooster...

If any doctor reports his house on fire, tell him the firemen are not in today.

12 posted on 01/30/2003 6:57:29 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
If any doctor calls for a policeman, tell them the police are not in today.

Awww, cyni, that's hardly an analogy, but good try. ;^)

13 posted on 01/30/2003 6:58:54 PM PST by RJCogburn (I mean to.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
New Jersey's trial lawyers are adamantly opposed to any such cap, and Mr. McGreevey has expressed sympathy with lawyers' opposition to curbs on victims' rights to sue doctors for serious medical mistakes.

And of course, the scumbag Democrats are in the pocket of the scumbag trial lawyers so....

Mr. Rasmussen said the governor favored the creation of a subsidy program to help those doctors who face the steepest increase in premiums.

.....so bend over, taxpayers, LOFL!!!

New Jersey is such a liberal toilet....

14 posted on 01/30/2003 7:08:09 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mr. Rasmussen said the governor favored the creation of a subsidy program to help those doctors who face the steepest increase in premiums.

WOW, an income redistribution scheme that benefits doctors? Unfriggingbelievable!!

McGreevy must really be a slimebag.

15 posted on 01/30/2003 7:25:11 PM PST by upchuck (TSCG: Your intelligence is equal to the smoothness of a walnut shell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Rooster...

Back when I was younger, my friends struck the FAA, doctor friends were outraged. They could'nt do that etc etc. That was a different horse...

16 posted on 01/30/2003 7:28:30 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Rooster...

In fact some demanded they all be fired for "withhholding a needed public service". Reagan did just that. They deserved to be fired. If a doctor wishes to walk out, fine thats his right, just suspend his license for 30 days. He does not have to work if he does not want to.

17 posted on 01/30/2003 7:35:54 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Do you spend all day in a tree playing the flute ??? That is the most disturbing reply I could imagine . Do you use Voodoo or the witch doctor to cure any ills ?
18 posted on 01/31/2003 3:31:53 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Are you referring to public employees who had a contractual obligation to work?

If so, that is hardly an analagous to private individuals who choose to work, or not. There is no contractual obligation for private individuals as there is for firefighters, police, or presumably your FAA friends...air traffic controllers, perhaps.

If private individuals can be forced, compelled, coerced into having to work, regardless of their own choices, well, that hardly sounds like a free society to me.

19 posted on 01/31/2003 4:37:57 AM PST by RJCogburn (Yes, it's bold talk........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Rooster....

Now Rooster, don't get confused as to the order in which anyone is forced or obligated to work or not.

The medical profession enjoys "total" protection from competion from many areas of other providers. For this they have no "contract" and no obligation, legal or otherwise???? Well, ok so be it.

How is one to square with the Federal government, legally forcing union workers to work against their wishes???? They have a right to strike, yet are forced to work. This is done because it is deemed to be harmful to the public welfare.

The doctors do not mind that the longshoremen, miners or whomever are forced to work. I suspect the difference here is that we are discussing a government protected profession vs the common man. The socialists realize this and exploit it, yet republicans and conservatives wonder why the common worker supports and votes for democrats.

The government does not protect the longshoremen from competion, yet recently they were forced to work against their will.

As for the FAA, I had retired the year before the strike. My friends were stupid for striking, yet they were fired for withholding their service, which no one else could provide, all in the name of public safety.

Personally, I am with the doctors but once again, they have shirked their obligation to society to open the medical field to others, refused to call for an increase in the supply of doctors, and why??? Because they have a lock on their clients because of the government. If they want to withhold their service, fine with me but I would suspend their licence, no other profession or employee has such protection. None, absolutely none.

20 posted on 01/31/2003 6:34:56 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson