Posted on 02/02/2003 10:58:45 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
Edited on 02/05/2003 5:44:04 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
NEWSWEEK: A Libyan official was convicted for the bombing of Pan Am 103. In order for UN sanctions to be lifted, Libya must take responsibility for the bombing. Do you accept responsibilty?
Kaddafi: The whole world bears witness to this man's innocence. It was not possible for the court to prove that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi put the bomb in the baggage.
You agreed to have the two Libyan suspects tried in a Scottish court in the Netherlands. One was aquitted; one convicted. Don't you accept the court's finding?
The court came to its finding without evidence.
He opened his country for full inspections. What more can he do? Now it is a fight to the finish. He must stand against the wall and fight.
If he believes Saddam is 'cooperating', I find myself wondering what his level of 'cooperation' has been.
The article ends with an admonishment: But as the war on terror continues, there is a central lesson to be remembered from the bloody record after 1986. It's the one taught to doctors by Hippocrates: First, do no harm..
They put forth the proposition that Reagan's actions increased terror, but the United Nations of course saved the day. The last statement of the article is a thinly veiled pitch not to go to war against Saddam.
Same 'Zionists control America', 'I wasn't a terrorist but a liberator', 'America is the real threat', and of course, his hopes for the demise of Israel.
I would watch this guy closely. Regardless of the happy face put on by the liberal media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.