Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
I'm arguing that alcohol has a significant history in the medical area, yet you're not interested in that history?

Should I be? If so, why?

(And have you abandoned your claims about the current medical significance of alcohol?)

28 posted on 02/03/2003 11:54:15 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: MrLeRoy
See my post #4. Alcohol has a history of use in the US (add cooking, an area I forgot), whereas marijuana doesn't.

The author is attempting to ignore that by placing alcohol and marijuana on equal historical footings with his sentence, "Pretend for a minute that humankind had not discovered alcohol until Drexel distilled it in 2000".

Not the same.

34 posted on 02/03/2003 12:08:21 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson