Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vic3O3
You premis on launch cycle rates is based on history; not the rate that was planned. Thus your "lifetime" figure is off.
108 posted on 02/07/2003 7:57:14 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: cinFLA; dd5339
I always thought the good engineer's motto was underpromise & overdeliver. NASA's (re: shuttle flight schedule)seems to be overpromise & underdeliver!

While yes, my projected launch cycle is based on history (that's all we have!) if NASA was going to ever speed it up, you'd think that in 22 years they'd have managed it!

Since they never have sped it up, my lifetime figure is more accurate (being based on actual launch #s) than their projected one!
123 posted on 02/07/2003 8:36:26 AM PST by Vic3O3 (-47 below keeps the riffraff out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson