Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb
how could it be foam damage? that's not where the debris hit on launch.
18 posted on 02/07/2003 5:11:48 AM PST by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: I_dmc
how could it be foam damage? that's not where the debris hit on launch.

Not according to this article:

"The initial NASA Mission Management Team (MMT) assessment of the debris impact made Jan. 18, two days after launch, noted "The strike appears to have occurred on or relatively close to the "wing glove" near the orbiter fuselage.

"The term "wing glove" generally refers to the area where the RCC bolt-on material is closest to the fuselage. This is also the general area where USAF imagery shows structural damage."

42 posted on 02/07/2003 5:34:39 AM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: I_dmc
how could it be foam damage? that's not where the debris hit on launch.

If I swing a baseball bat at the top of a fence post, it will probably break off, or crack, at the bottom.

181 posted on 02/07/2003 10:08:48 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson