To: SJackson
Ridiculous.
I don't care how Bush gets what he wants.
If he bluffs it out of Saddam, so much the better.
If Saddam won't be budged and Bush takes him out, then that's the best, isn't it?
8 posted on
02/10/2003 5:14:27 PM PST by
xzins
(Babylon - You have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting.)
To: xzins
It would be better if it could be resolved peacefully, but dissarmament isn't what Bush really wants. The problem with dissarmament is it does nothing to prevent terrorism of which Saddam is a major player.
If Bush can bluff Saddam into stepping down or his generals into seizing power from him, that would be great.
Otherwise he needs to go.
The world shouldn't expect the US to leave it's troops sitting around Saddam forever, nor should we allow them to put us in that position. When we are ready we should take Saddam out.
10 posted on
02/10/2003 7:53:45 PM PST by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson