Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrLeRoy
"That these legislative bans were found justifiable during wartime in no way implies that they would be justifiable during peacetime."

Yeah, I remember now. We used a different US Constitution during WWI. Could you do me a big favor and dig that one up for me?

113 posted on 02/13/2003 8:26:22 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
"That these legislative bans were found justifiable during wartime in no way implies that they would be justifiable during peacetime."

Yeah, I remember now. We used a different US Constitution during WWI.

No, but the Supreme Court has traditionally taken a relatively lenient view of federal actions presented as wartime needs.

116 posted on 02/13/2003 8:37:35 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
Look, legislatures pass illegal laws at times. These temperance laws obviously were political bone-tosses. Did they get tested in the courts? Some times, such bad laws don't -- no one enforces them, mooting a court action, or as may have happened here -- a legitimate act superceded these bad laws and they never did get tested.

So let's ask ... Are they still in force now? And did they ever get tested in the courts?

117 posted on 02/13/2003 8:42:57 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson