Posted on 02/13/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by Remedy
Summary: A homosexual magazine says that cloning may be the way for homosexuals to avoid heterosexual reproduction altogetherand to create homosexual offspring.
MetroWeekly, a Washington, DC-based homosexual magazine published "Born Again? Is Cloning the Key to Gay Reproduction?" in its January 30, 2003 issue.
The article notes that cloning will enable homosexual couples must find a third party to donate a sperm or egg to the reproductive process. With cloning, homosexuals can avoid any heterosexual contact whatsoever.
Cloning activist Randolfe Wicker has been pushing for the legalization of cloning for years. In an interview in 1997, Wicker said: "Cloning renders heterosexualitys monopoly on reproduction obsolete
.A new religion will grow from this."
Jack Nichols, editor of GayToday is a friend of Wicker. He told him: "You know what this means? This means that some of the desire to unsettle the nuclear family has been given a boon. Now you can raise your own father."
Lesbian activist Ann Northrop also supports cloning because she hates men: "If cloning is, in fact, true, men are going to have a very hard time justifying their existence on the planet. Essentially, this is sort of the final nail in mens coffins."
The MetroWeekly article also notes that the Raelian cult pushing for cloning sees this process as a help for homosexuals. Pierre-Paul Borque is a Canadian homosexual priest in the Raelian movement. He predicts that cloning will render the issue of sexual orientation obsolete. "In our philosophy," says Borque, "we develop our sensuality. Raelians are always touching and hugging and kissing because theres love between us. It doesnt matter what your sexual orientation is."
This is all the more reason why Congress must enact a total ban on human cloning.
In 1997, lesbian editorialist and activist Lillian Faderman profiled 5 lesbian leaders who had recently abandoned homosexuality when they fell in love with a man.
Nations most often fall from within, and this fall is usually due to a decline in the moral and spiritual values in the family. As families go, so goes a nation.
This has been the main premise of thinkers from British historian J. D. Unwin to Russian sociologist Pitirim Sorokin who have studied civilizations that have collapsed. In his book Our Dance Has Turned to Death, Carl Wilson identifies the common pattern of family decline in ancient Greece and the Roman Empire. Notice how these seven stages parallel what is happening in our nation today. In the first stage, men ceased to lead their families in worship. Spiritual and moral development became secondary. Their view of God became naturalistic, mathematical, and mechanical.
In the second stage, men selfishly neglected care of their wives and children to pursue material wealth, political and military power, and cultural development. Material values began to dominate thought, and the man began to exalt his own role as an individual. The third stage involved a change in men's sexual values. Men who were preoccupied with business or war either neglected their wives sexually or became involved with lower-class women or with homosexuality. Ultimately, a double standard of morality developed. The fourth stage affected women. The role of women at home and with children lost value and status. Women were neglected and their roles devalued. Soon they revolted to gain access to material wealth and also freedom for sex outside marriage. Women also began to minimize having sex relations to conceive children, and the emphasis became sex for pleasure. Marriage laws were changed to make divorce easy.
In the fifth stage, husbands and wives competed against each other for money, home leadership, and the affection of their children. This resulted in hostility and frustration and possible homosexuality in the children. Many marriages ended in separation and divorce.
Many children were unwanted, aborted, abandoned, molested, and undisciplined. The more undisciplined children became, the more social pressure there was not to have children. The breakdown of the home produced anarchy.
In the sixth stage, selfish individualism grew and carried over into society, fragmenting it into smaller and smaller group loyalties. The nation was thus weakened by internal conflict. The decrease in the birthrate produced an older population that had less ability to defend itself and less will to do so, making the nation more vulnerable to its enemies.
Finally, unbelief in God became more complete, parental authority diminished, and ethical and moral principles disappeared, affecting the economy and government. Thus, by internal weakness and fragmentation the societies came apart. There was no way to save them except by a dictator who arose from within or by barbarians who invaded from without.
Although this is an ancient pattern of decline found in Greece and Rome, it is relevant today. Families are the foundation of a nation. When the family crumbles, the nation falls because nations are built upon family units. They are the true driving social force. A nation will not be strong unless the family is strong. That was true in the ancient world and it is true today.
Social commentator Michael Novak, writing on the importance of the family, said:
One unforgettable law has been learned through all the disasters and injustices of the last thousand years: If things go well with the family, life is worth living; when the family falters, life falls apart.
Bookmarked for further study....
And PING to you other extremist fanatics....;^)
I don't know what trama this male hater suffered here
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.