Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Hopefuls Eye Homeland Sec.
AP ^ | 2/14/03 | Will Lester

Posted on 02/14/2003 4:59:15 PM PST by anniegetyourgun

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats remained silent for months as the United States waged war in Afghanistan, wary of challenging a popular commander in chief. But if terrorists strike again on U.S. soil, many of President Bush's rivals have the standing to question whether his administration has done enough to protect the nation.

Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman pushed for creation of a Homeland Security agency months before Bush embraced the idea and proposed establishment of a department with a Cabinet-level secretary. Florida's Bob Graham, the former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has repeatedly argued that the administration is focused too much on Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and not enough on al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations. Former Colorado Sen. Gary Hart has served on independent commissions that have warned about weaknesses in U.S. security.

Few Democrats would be so presumptuous as to say, "I told you so," especially if chemical clouds are floating over American cities, but as the election draws near, Bush's rivals will be less reticent about criticizing him.

"It's the right issue for Democrats," said Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a centrist think tank. "This administration is not giving the kind of priority to homeland security that we need. This is No. 1 on the American people's list of concerns."

The Bush administration would argue that the previous Congress, in particular the Democrat-controlled Senate, allowed a fight over a labor provision to delay creation of the Department of Homeland Security. The White House also would make the case that lawmakers, including many of those Democratic candidates, have been slow to provide the money for state and local governments to combat terrorism.

"It's just unfortunate that the president proposed a budget that had a 1,000 percent increase for first responders and the Congress has still failed to appropriate those funds," said Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security.

Still, Democrats have sought to highlight the issue.

Sen. John Kerry, a three-term senator and longtime member of the Foreign Relations Committee, has worked on legislation to beef up security at airports and ocean ports. Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt was an early proponent of creating a domestic security agency.

North Carolina's freshman Sen. John Edwards has introduced several bills on homeland security, including one calling for creation of a homeland intelligence agency.

Lieberman, in a speech he was delivering Friday, called for establishment of a homeland security academy like a domestic West Point and suggested creation of a 24-hour operations center in each state to provide communications links between local and state officials and the federal government.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean has said: "I don't think the president is doing what he should be doing on homeland security. I see his attention wandering, so obsessed with Iraq, losing our focus on al-Qaida, and homeland security is an important piece of that."

Campaign watchers suggest that the Democratic candidates will not be hesitant to speak out. "We've had all these terrifying alerts, getting on to two years now," Marshall said. "People will want to know why, if we have not built up our defenses as we should have."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dems; vultures
Lib/dems circling over their own countrymen.....
1 posted on 02/14/2003 4:59:15 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
As I predicted last month, given Bob Graham and Hillary Clinton spouting off about this.

I am convinced that they KNOW we are going to get another attack. No amount of money is going to stop it.

My only hope is that when another attack comes, they are smack dab in the middle of it.

2 posted on 02/14/2003 5:02:11 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
And yet none of the above has made specific proposals. In the absence of constructive ideas for improvement, beating the drum on this issue makes it a big loser.
3 posted on 02/14/2003 5:07:53 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The Demorats are certainly the party of hope:

- Hope for another terrorist attack.
- Hope the economy does poorly in '03.
- Hope for a military defeat overseas.
4 posted on 02/14/2003 5:17:22 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Just caught part of the Fox roundtable-Mort mentioned a comment that Fred Barnes had made earlier. Apparently members of Congress,were given a special security briefing( I assume terror,possibly Iraq-but, then again,they are one and the same) and some left the room " ashen faced " after the briefing. There were a lot of flame throwers here last night towards Frist,but, he may have been given a security "heads up", to vacate Dodge .Any Democrat who has a better idea on how to protect the Homeland and keeps silent for political gain-should be held as an accessory to murder, should another attack occur.
5 posted on 02/14/2003 5:24:43 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue ( A cyberspace dozen roses for Valentine's Day ,to thank you for your dedication to the cause :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
*"It's the right issue for Democrats,"*

Complaining, criticizing, crabbing, whining,....yup sounds like them all right!
6 posted on 02/14/2003 6:06:56 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Who would have anticipated Germany and France to be the entity that is doing the de-stabilizing!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The Progressive Policy Institute is a "centrist" think tank?
7 posted on 02/14/2003 6:20:11 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
This is a very risky strategy, but perhaps the only thing they have. Pray for an attack, and then criticize Bush for not having done enough.

Of course, they don't want to do enough either, but they're hoping no one notices that, and the mainstream media certainly aren't reporting it.

8 posted on 02/14/2003 11:33:47 PM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I sense a tremendous anger from your comments, MM. And, I completely understand it. This strategy of 'laying in wait' for the President (and therefore, the entire nation) is the same strategy held by the terrorists.
9 posted on 02/15/2003 4:23:26 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson