Skip to comments.
Three mystery ships are tracked over suspected 'weapons' cargo
independent.co.uk ^
| 2/19/03
Posted on 02/18/2003 4:47:00 PM PST by knak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-222 next last
To: StriperSniper
Geez, it sounds like the Krauts should be under surveillance too!
To: FairOpinion
"
And as the article said, if we sank them, they may contaminate the oceans, killing all life, and spreading disease, which may spread to humans."
***DRAMAQUEEN ALERT***
62
posted on
02/18/2003 5:29:39 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(tm)
To: bert
???? what port??? this report smells bad to me. Perhaps Cairo. Then the report goes on to say -
"The ships are thought to have set sail from a country other than Iraq to avoid running the gauntlet of Western naval vessels patrolling the Gulf. Defence experts believe that, if they are carrying weapons of mass destruction, these could have been smuggled out through Syria or Jordan."
63
posted on
02/18/2003 5:30:16 PM PST
by
HAL9000
To: friendly
More like a job for Austin Powers and Foxy Cleopatra-he's smashing baby-yeah!
To: Robert_Paulson2
You think these countries don't know we track them? Please.
To: mountaineer
66
posted on
02/18/2003 5:30:40 PM PST
by
Gamecock
(You take your Germany, France and Spain, roll them all together and it wouldn't give us room to park)
To: glock rocks
Might this cause tidal waves?
To: Archangelsk
Exactly how do you know that we didn't pick it up being loaded in the sea? For all you know, we have people working in the factories making the stuff. Remember this isn't a CIA report, it's a newspaper article.
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
We know that they know that we know.
To: TheHound
You are right about the oceans, hound. This is a calculated news release, designed to let our enemies (and their allies) know that we are watching their every move.
In the early 90's, the catch phrase was "We own the night" because of our superior night vision technology. Now, with superior satellite optics, we own the knowledge of everything that moves. (...and everything that doesn't.)
I want to know more about these goddamned ships, and I want the US media to get on it, now.
70
posted on
02/18/2003 5:34:13 PM PST
by
Semper911
(I used to have another tagline. This is my new one.)
To: jerseygirl
"We know that they know that we know."That's just what they want you to think.
71
posted on
02/18/2003 5:34:41 PM PST
by
Fabozz
To: knak
If this isn't a job for our new 2 billion watt cruise missles, I don't know what is. They couldn't dump much overboard without electricity, 'specially at night.
To: knak
If the ship was laden with Iraqi banned weapons how did it get past the patrolled sea embargo against that country?
73
posted on
02/18/2003 5:36:56 PM PST
by
Int
To: Domestic Church
just temporary ones.
i guess we could just be happy they don't port in long beach.
or steam into the hudson.
74
posted on
02/18/2003 5:37:47 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(honest. i took the meds. really. i'm feeling better already.)
To: Fabozz
Actually, its what they think they want you to think you know but they don't know we know... as far as they know we could know, but they don't really know what we know. I know that's how we'd want it, knowing disinformation as I know it...or, how I want you to think I know it.
To: FairOpinion
And as the article said, if we sank them, they may contaminate the oceans, killing all life, and spreading disease, which may spread to humans. It would cause nothing but local effects, and unless slowly leaking, not for long. Think about the billions of gallons of nasty stuff that has already been dumped in the oceans as far as chemical. Bio, unless fish can catch Smallpox and Ebola then give it to me when I eat them, no problem. And I think there are already multiple nukes that are down there now.
If it can be captured without too much risk to our guys, go for it, or sink them.
(Besides, I'd like to catch a two-headed fish with only three legs ;-)
76
posted on
02/18/2003 5:39:17 PM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Frogs are for gigging)
To: Domestic Church
Might this cause tidal waves?
The energy of every nuke in the world combined is trivial compared to the energy of your average tsunami-causing earthquake or volcanic collapse.
So no, you can't cause a tsunami with nukes, unless you happened to be RIGHT NEXT to where it went off, and you have plenty of other problems to worry about then. You can't create a noticeable wave over hundreds of miles.
77
posted on
02/18/2003 5:39:55 PM PST
by
John H K
To: Principled
time for me to crack a beer...
To: bkwells
Need to know Ping
To: piasa
Thanks for posting that, piasa! I knew I'd seen it somewhere today!
80
posted on
02/18/2003 5:41:05 PM PST
by
livius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-222 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson