Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Famed reporter criticizes Iraq tact (Bernstein projectile vomit alert)
Knight-Ridder (Aberdeen American News) ^ | 02-20-2003 | DONNA WRIGHT

Posted on 02/20/2003 10:01:03 AM PST by jwalburg

Journalist Carl Bernstein, who helped break the Watergate story three decades ago, told a Sarasota audience Wednesday that the Bush administration should seek to prevent a holy war, not start one.

The former Washington Post reporter spoke to a sell-out audience at Van Wezel Performing Arts Hall as a guest speaker in the Town Hall Lecture series, sponsored by Ringling School of Art and Design

"We need less attitude in Washington and more diplomacy," Bernstein said. "And I say this with real respect for George W. Bush . . . but I do not believe his theological rhetoric about good and evil is the best way of resolving the Iraqi conflict."

While he agreed Saddam Hussein must be removed, Bernstein criticized Bush for being very selective in whom he names among evil-doers.

"Our President doesn't talk about Saudi Arabia, he doesn't talk about Nigeria, where women are stoned because of adultery," Bernstein said. "He doesn't talk about the fact that most of these Iraqi arms we are trying to get rid of are the very arms and weapons that we gave to them."

Although he supports the build-up of troops in the Persian Gulf, Bernstein stopped short of endorsing an immediate attack on Iraq.

"I think there are other ways of getting rid of Saddam Hussein without going to war."

He advocated instead to give weapons inspectors a few more months to search for weapons of mass destruction. If those inspections fail, then the United States should go to war only through the United Nations and with European allies at our side.

"But Bush has complicated those alliances," he said. "It would be easier to make the case had we signed the Kyoto treaty on global warming. . . . Had we not given the Europeans an excuse to say we are unilateralists, unconcerned about the same things they are concerned on."

Bernstein reserved his most stinging criticism for fellow journalists - accusing them of abandoning the search for the best obtainable version of the truth for news that sells.

"Our stake in maintaining the myth and the attendant self-image that we are doing a great job is every bit as great a fiction as that of the American Congress serving the people," Bernstein said. "The gravest threat to the truth today may well be within our own profession."

He cited American media's coverage of worldwide peace demonstrations last weekend as an example of news without proper context.

"Whether we agree with those demonstrations or whether we believe they were out of line or wrong headed, these were huge events that are helping to shape what is happening in the United Nations and whether we go to war," he said. "Yet on television those demonstrations . . . were treated dismissively, condescendingly and patronizingly as if they were not important news."

Journalists must be willing to go after the hard stories, he warned, digging to find all of the facts and presenting them in broad context.

"But reporters can't do it alone," Bernstein said. "We need courage, we need willingness on the part of publishers to commit to finding the best obtainable version of the truth, however difficult that might be."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Donna Wright, health and social services reporter, can be reached at 745-7049 or at dwright@bradentonherald.com.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernstein; inspections; iraq; media
"Yet on television those demonstrations . . . were treated dismissively, condescendingly and patronizingly as if they were not important news."

Really?

"I think there are other ways of getting rid of Saddam Hussein without going to war."

Does he name one that could possibly work?

1 posted on 02/20/2003 10:01:03 AM PST by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Journalist Carl Bernstein, who helped break the Watergate story three decades ago, told a Sarasota audience Wednesday that the Bush administration should seek to prevent a holy war, not start one.

Got news for you Carl. This "holy" war was started 9/11/01 when we were attacked. Maybe you didn't hear about it. At any rate, we're going to finish it.

2 posted on 02/20/2003 10:04:33 AM PST by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Guess Bernstein never heard of Neville Chamberlain, the guy that plowed that same field years ago, and came up with a very bitter harvest.
3 posted on 02/20/2003 10:04:58 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Where was Bernstein when Clinton was bombing children in Kosovo so he could get his oil pipeline built?
4 posted on 02/20/2003 10:10:50 AM PST by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
"Journalists must be willing to go after the hard stories..."

"Investigative reporting is the job of the tabloid press."
                  --Ted Koppel when asked about the lack of press
                   interest in the Clinton scandals/treason.
5 posted on 02/20/2003 10:27:27 AM PST by gcruse (When choosing between two evils, pick the one you haven't tried yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Carl sold away his credibilty during the Clinton administration when he refused to use his Great Journalistic Skills to expose White House crimes. He looked the other way, as did all Democrat party loyalists. For a guy who became famous for uncovering White House corruption, this is inexcusable. Like the UN, Bernstein is irrelevant.
6 posted on 02/20/2003 10:30:41 AM PST by moodyskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
Bernstein, who knows less about foreign policy than my dog, must be on the pipe again.
7 posted on 02/20/2003 11:32:14 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
"He doesn't talk about the fact that most of these Iraqi arms we are trying to get rid of are the very arms and weapons that we gave to them."

What a load of crap. Germany and France and Russia accounted for almost 90% of all arms sales to Iraq in the 80s and the US accounted for less than 1%. And that comes from a LIBERAL "watchdog group".

I don't have the name in front of me but I will find it and post it on this thread.

8 posted on 02/20/2003 7:18:03 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Carl Bernstein used his Watergate reporting fame and money to drug and drink with the celebrity crowd and his life went down the toilet. He's just another alcoholic, druggie a-hole giving his leftist opinion.
9 posted on 02/20/2003 7:26:22 PM PST by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
That did sound a little fishy, especially when Russia was their ally for so long.
10 posted on 02/20/2003 7:48:19 PM PST by jwalburg (Will renewed fears of nuclear winter cancel out global warming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg; Libertina; Travis McGee; Billthedrill; summer; Dead Dog
Here is a link to the Stockholm International Peace Research Intitute's study showing the dollar value of the arms transferred to Iraq listed by nation states from 1982-1990.

http://projects.sipri.se/armstrade/Tnd_Ind_IRQ_Imps_82-01.pdf

Also I was incorrect to list Germany.

Here are the countries and the percentage values of the arms they transferred to Iraq during those years.

USSR 50%
CHINA 18%
FRANCE 13%
POLAND 5%
CZECH. 5%
EGYPT 2%
BRAZIL 2%
ROMANIA 2%
DENMARK 1%
LYBIA 1%
USA 1%


And the actual percentage the USA sold is less than 1% but because of rounding it is listed as 1%.

Carl Bernstein in this article talks about finding out the "best version of the truth" and I guess the best version he can come up with is a stinking pile.

The truth is an entity. There is no "best version" of the truth. There is the truth and then there are those things we call fiction, half truths, lies, mistatements, and pick any number of words to describe non-truths.

The truth exists even if nobody recognizes it. If every person in the world said I have 42DD breasts and even I agreed with them the truth is I don't have breasts. ( I don't even need a mansiere or a bro)

Just because people believe something doesn't make it true or accurate and that's why I live in the real world and not in a make believe world that Sociologists try to create.

11 posted on 02/20/2003 7:52:51 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson