Contacted Thursday by The Times, [Jane] Leavy [Koufax's biographer], a former Washington Post reporter, said she assumed the item was about her book. She called it "thoroughly erroneous on all counts. [The item] was blatantly unfair, scandalous and contemptible. It was thoroughly without basis in so far as it had to do with Sandy or any relationship I had with him professionally. It's not the kind of journalism I practice."
But hey, what do you expect from a "conservative" who gives to Al Gore?
When these things surface, stand up and defend them with your head held high. It seems to me that Sandy can't do that in this instance. And that makes me sorrier for Sandy than the revelation itself. Whatevery he is, Sandy should be perfectly at ease with it, if he wants true happiness. When it all comes down to it, what we think shoudn't matter a hill of beans to him.