As one who loves a good verbal 'brawl' as much as anyone........there is a difference between intelligent sparring, and deliberate distortion and mindless crudity (aimed primarily, IMO, at women).
and, btw.......isn't this story getting really old??? How many times can we 'question' the propriety of entertaining a man who is now in the slammer?? You're a smart guy, Sabertooth.....don't you see the absurdity of beating this dead horse.......I mean why don't you bring up Enron, or the BUSH KNEW scandal?......they're just a little older, and equally preposterous.
There certainly is. And while I've never seen Sabertooth engage in such behavior, the same can't be said for some of the people I've seen frequenting "his" threads.
and, btw.......isn't this story getting really old??? How many times can we 'question' the propriety of entertaining a man who is now in the slammer??
The part I wonder about is whether or not Bush actually knew the guy was a suspected terrorist. And the part that worries me most of all is the idea that either the Secret Service didn't get the message that some of the WH guests might be criminals, or they were over-ruled by some junior staffers.
DITTO .. personally it's giving me a HUGE headace
It's more than just one guy. It's not a dead horse. I've posted numerous articles and links. This is a scandal that doesn't have to touch the President. but he needs to roll some heads. Some of his subordinates have been sloppy, or worse, in allowing terrorist sympathizers, supporters, and co-conspirators access to the White House, as recently as last month.
