To: nicmarlo
Oh I know. My like of her has severely declined. She hasn't shown me any intelligence to back up her stance. I can respect those who have intelligent reasons for not supporting war. But I just can't find any in 'karmic retributions' and 'the answer is to not have any enemies'.
31 posted on
02/25/2003 9:17:46 PM PST by
rintense
(Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
To: rintense
intelligent reasons for not supporting an immoral war, yes; but this war is to free tortured women and children...protecting Iraqi neighbors....protecting our own people....preventing terrorists from getting aid....being against this war is just the same as being against Hitler, really; and that would be indefensible.
But Bush is of such a character, that he would not choose to go into any immoral war. So, really, it is also an attack against him.
35 posted on
02/25/2003 9:22:24 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: rintense
did you see the interview with the defector the other night (or last night) that they discussed a bit tonight on FOX? I can't remember which program at the moment...I think on Hannity....was it CBS, about the scientist who said he can't stop hearing children screaming who were being tortured so their parents would talk? ugh. awful.
40 posted on
02/25/2003 9:26:55 PM PST by
nicmarlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson