Replies

IMO,

I don't see how they can hold the Band equally Liable in this.

A) It's passed fire Inspection since 2000, how many times (once, twice a year?) with that up on the walls?

B) GW lawyers state at least 6 bands have used pyros in that club in the last two months. They have some bands on Film to back up this claim.

C) The "owners" aren't cooperating fully, unlike the Band. The Owner also sold tickets at the door to an already sold out show. (business cards he used) He filmed himself, in his own club over crowding.

D) from what I understand The Station had to hire 2 people to unload the bus, Which means they also had to unload the Sparklers.

E) They were in the process of selling the business.

I could go on and on.. but... Most GW could possibly be charged for is not getting a permit. (Dunno if that would be the band itself or the Management of the band, I will have to keep looking for answers on that.)

I don't see how they can hold the Band equally Liable in this.

The club for providing a fire trap and the band for setting that fire trap on fire.

Seems pretty equal in the negligence dept. to me.

(Dunno if that would be the band itself or the Management of the band, I will have to keep looking for answers on that.)

A lot of information floating around out there, but I believe I read that in that state, it is the club that is supposed to get the permit. That could have been in a post and not an article though, so consider the source.

I can't believe how many people are still blaming the band for this, with all we've learned.