Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stone Mountain
Creating objective criterion for being an "avowed" homosexual would mean that they would have to live by those criterion. The BSA is clearly not ready or capable of doing such a thing. For that matter, is there any kind of consensus out there as to what an "avowed" homosexual is? As it is, the BSA can interpret to mean whatever they want it to mean. Giving an interview to a paper, attending a parade, whatever - much more flexible that way.

Actually, with that last comment you've probably hit the nail on the head. You see, the BSA often leaves flexibility in thier policies so as to allow different local Councils an ability to adapt National guidelines to the community's own environment.

The amount of adaptation that a local Council is allowed depends on the type of policy. Membership policies tend to be the least flexible, but to me it seems that the deliberate addition of the word "avowed" in front of homosexual is, at the least, meant to establish that something other than merely being homosexual is necessary to ban someone from registering as a Scouter. It's more than just homosexual status that disqualifies you from the BSA, there's got to be some behavior too. The BSA, as it often does with other policies, allows local Councils some latitude in deterimining what that behavior is.

203 posted on 03/04/2003 6:47:35 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: RonF
It's more than just homosexual status that disqualifies you from the BSA, there's got to be some behavior too.

But what, nobody can say...
216 posted on 03/05/2003 9:27:55 AM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson