Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
I'm afraid I don't understand what you're driving at, either. Could you spell it out for us?

A common misconception by laymen is that the force is derived from "pushing against" the water/air as in pushing against a wall. In reality, the force is derived from the acceleration of the water/air. The force would be the same in a vacuum for the same amount of water/air accelerated even though there would be no air/water to push against.

78 posted on 02/28/2003 7:36:02 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: cinFLA
A common misconception by laymen is that the force is derived from "pushing against" the water/air as in pushing against a wall. In reality, the force is derived from the acceleration of the water/air. The force would be the same in a vacuum for the same amount of water/air accelerated even though there would be no air/water to push against.

It's not a misconception at all. Pushing against a brick wall (or against the ground) is the same thing as pushing against a mass of air or pushing against a jet of hydrazine in a hard vacuum. In each of these cases, it's Newton's Third Law that moves you about. In the case of a brick wall or a planet, the reaction mass is gigantic (never infinite, however), whereas in the case of hydrazine molecules, the reaction mass is tiny. The principle is the same, though. The differences are only quantitative.

98 posted on 03/01/2003 3:21:56 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson