I presume you’re not referring to the court summaries in which suits against presidential use of force with only congressional authorization were dismissed.
exodus - I believe that those people don't know any more than I do about law. A lawful requirement is supposed to be met. That's why it's labeled as a requirement. Thanks for looking that up, but your links do not answer my request.**********************
elfman2 - I presume you’re not referring to the court summaries in which suits against presidential use of force with only congressional authorization were dismissed.
You said that this case had been ruled on, that Bush has a judicial ruling in his favor, that the court decided that Bush has the authority to go to war on only his own decision.
You are giving me generic opinions, not specific opinions. I don't believe the courts have ruled on this case, and so far your claim that they did has not been substantiated..