**********************
I think you’re mistaken. Refusal to take a case is a court ruling that the case has no merit, and that the constitutional challenge is groundless.
A judge, one man, decided that Congress and the President didn't violate the law when the President went to war on his own. That judge has no business deciding that this case didn't merit consideration. Deciding whether a case has merit is the job of a Grand Jury, not of any judge.
I am also one man, and I say that our law has been violated.
Repeatedly these kind of challenges have been dismissed. If they were serious challenges, pressure would have come to bare to accept these cases. That’s how the Constitution has established the courts. I don’t think it establishes Grand Juries as arbitrators on constitutionality as you claim. Yes, you are one man, but I can’t take you seriously any longer. Best regards…