Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam adviser: Iraq may stop destruction of missiles
Al-Bawaba ^ | 2-3-03 (arabic time) | Albawaba.com

Posted on 03/02/2003 6:24:51 PM PST by mcrommert

Iraq destroyed six Al Samoud 2 missiles Sunday but warned it may suspend the destruction process if Washington indicates it will go to war anyway.

In two days, Iraq has destroyed 10 missiles, which the United Nations has ordered eliminated. It has also destroyed two casting chambers used to make engines for the Al Fatah missile.

"As you can see, there is proactive cooperation from the Iraqi side," Saddam Hussein's scientific adviser, Lt. Gen. Amer al-Saadi, said at a news conference.

"Practically all the areas of concern to UNMOVIC and the subjects of remaining disarmament questions have been addressed," he said. "We hope that it will be to the satisfaction of UNMOVIC."

But he cautioned that if the United States indicated it will go to war anyway, Iraq might stop destroying the missiles.

"If it turns out at an early stage during this month that America is not going to a legal way, then why should we continue?" al-Saadi asked.

Inspectors returned Sunday to al-Aziziya, an abandoned helicopter airfield 95 kilometers southeast of Baghdad where Iraq says it destroyed R-400 bombs filled with biological weapons in 1991.

Al-Saadi said 157 of the R-400 bombs contained anthrax, aflotoxin and botulin toxin. He added Iraq has been excavating them and so far has uncovered eight bombs intact.

On Sunday, U.N. weapons inspectors took samples of the material in the bombs to confirm their composition. Al-Saadi said Iraq had destroyed 1.5 tons of VX and was trying to prove that to inspectors.

Iraq has agreed to destroy all unassembled pieces, software, launchers, fuel and equipment used to make the Al Samoud 2 in "a few days or a very short few weeks," according to Demetrius Perricos, the deputy of chief weapons inspector Hans Blix.

Al-Saadi indicated it is not easy for Iraq to do that. He said Iraq won't let anyone see photographs or video images of the missile destruction — despite the potential impact on world opinion — because it would be too bitter for the Iraqi people to watch.

"It is too harsh. It is unacceptable," he said. "That's why we have released no pictures."

Al-Saadi argued for continued inspections. He said U.S. claims that Iraq isn't disarming are lies — and said the only way to find out is with an independent arbiter. "We need a judge on this issue," he said. "The judge is UNMOVIC."

Al-Saadi also appealed to Americans' pocketbooks. "UNMOVIC costs $80 million a year. A war would cost upwards of $80 billion — plus bloodshed on both sides," he said. He pointed out that UNMOVIC is financed by Iraq's oil-for-food program and asked which of two possibilities made more sense: "Disarmament — peaceful — at no cost to the American taxpayer. A war — $80 billion — to achieve disarmament."

Meanwhile, Iraqis saw Saddam on Sunday night's television news, listening to a string of army officers telling him of their readiness for war. One said recruits are refusing to take their days off, and another said soldiers are digging trenches to protect themselves from bombs.

One officer told Saddam that American planes are dropping leaflets. "They weren't able to defeat us with bombs. Are they going to defeat us with leaflets?" Saddam asked the officer. (Albawaba.com)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; missiles; weapons; wmd
This is interesting. Have fun with this one. Knew you couldn't trust them
1 posted on 03/02/2003 6:24:51 PM PST by mcrommert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Bush advisor: We will start destroying missiles...
2 posted on 03/02/2003 6:27:33 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
They are in no position to dictate anything to anybody. They are a defeated agressor under terms to dissarm.
3 posted on 03/02/2003 6:29:06 PM PST by ChadGore (Going to war without the French is like going hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Next they'll claim that since the US is going to attack them, they will claim the right to use chemical and biological WMD's they don't have, in order to defend themselves.

And, of course, Hans "Clousseau" Blix, will nod his potato-head, and claim that Iraq would be totally justified in doing so.
4 posted on 03/02/2003 6:31:02 PM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
He said Iraq won't let anyone see photographs or video images of the missile destruction — despite the potential impact on world opinion — because it would be too bitter for the Iraqi people to watch.

Translation: We have more missiles and stuff to go in them than we want you to know about. No cameras!

5 posted on 03/02/2003 6:33:22 PM PST by TADSLOS (Gunner, Target!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
because it would be too bitter for the Iraqi people to watch.

If I was George Bush, I would take the figures that were quoted on 60 Minutes about how much money Saddam has stolen from "the people of Iraq" and put in his OWN accounts and drop them all over Iraq about a hour before the bombing started.

6 posted on 03/02/2003 6:35:13 PM PST by Howlin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Iraq won't let anyone see photographs or video images of the missile destruction ... because it would be too bitter for the Iraqi people to watch

But not as bitter as watching your whole country invaded and conquered. Yeah, right.
7 posted on 03/02/2003 6:36:03 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Welcome to FR..To be starting so young on a conservative path, you must have fine parents!!!!
8 posted on 03/02/2003 6:36:08 PM PST by viccim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: viccim
Thank you very much. I do have fine parents, especially my dad who encouraged me to listen to Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk radio hosts.
9 posted on 03/02/2003 6:43:00 PM PST by mcrommert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Clinton and this bunch would communicate very well togerher
"THEY LIE SO WELL"
10 posted on 03/02/2003 6:44:51 PM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
"One said recruits are refusing to take their days off"

Yeah. I bet.

11 posted on 03/02/2003 6:45:06 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
They can build new missiles faster than they're destroying them anyhow.
This is such a bunch of crap.
12 posted on 03/02/2003 6:46:37 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
Recruits are refusing to take their days off, and another said soldiers are digging trenches to protect themselves from bombs.

Reminds me of the old days in school when hiding under a desk with hands between our legs was going to "protect" us from a Russian A-Bomb.

13 posted on 03/02/2003 6:51:08 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats: 'Hating and betraying America's heritage is our "right."')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
In two days, Iraq has destroyed 10 missiles

Sure they did - and where is the proof? Were our beloved inspectors there to whitness it?

What is their definition of "destroy"? Did they just disassemble them into smaller components?

Of course, the world will tell us to back off - that Saddam is trying to do right.

What a crock!

14 posted on 03/02/2003 7:12:19 PM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
actually the inspectors where there to witness it. They saw the 10 missiles destroyed outside of the city starting march 1st.
15 posted on 03/02/2003 7:19:24 PM PST by mcrommert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
They are running the missiles over with bulldozers
16 posted on 03/02/2003 7:24:13 PM PST by mcrommert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
They are in no position to dictate anything to anybody. They are a defeated agressor under terms to dissarm.

They're really crapping down both legs about now.

17 posted on 03/02/2003 7:39:10 PM PST by ward_of_the_state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Boy you must be a fellow geezer to remember that...
18 posted on 03/02/2003 10:02:20 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
"Boy you must be a fellow geezer to remember that..."

Yep -- scarred for life since kindergarten.

These days I grab the ref's whistle and occassionally get the whole family underneath the dining room table just for nostalgia's sake ;-)

19 posted on 03/02/2003 10:50:58 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats: 'Hating and betraying America's heritage is our "right."')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mcrommert
In other words, these were dummy missiles? I seriously doubt Iraq would run over any functional technology with a bulldozer.

This would also indicated that these rockets didn't have warheads or rocket motors installed, as these would pose a huge risk to those handling them. So where are these components?

My guess would be installed in other functional missiles.
20 posted on 03/03/2003 5:19:15 AM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson