Aziz nuked her by holding up his book of Halabja pictures and asked her "What about Halabja?"
Koppel got out of this situtation by saying that all sides could furnish pictures of atrocities blah blah blah...
Mainstream media biased? Nah...
This is a standard liberal debate ploy. I'm assuming that the woman's picture was of, worst case, limited collateral damage arising from the legal use of arms, whereas Aziz's picture was the result of mass death resulting from the illegal use of weapons of mass destruction. Once Aziz makes his point that the two are not equivalent, the liberal interjects something like, "Both sides are guilty of this," and proceeds to continue bashing or to aid and abet the bashing of the responsible, logical, conservative position. Those who irresponsibly argue moral equivalency are heinously immoral and should be treated as such.